View Single Post
Old 09-02-2009, 09:10 AM   #5
DOSMedia4SC
Banned
 
DOSMedia4SC's Arena
 
OVR: 10
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bend, Oregon
Re: *JaBronie247 Hiesman Sliders*

Alright I just played Cinci vs Oregon State (me) with Roman Caesar's roster. Both teams perfectly even. It seems as if "robo qb" is a factor with these sliders. I can think of only 4 of cinci's incompletions that were not from a screen pass. The CPU should seriously never run screens in this game. Also the human run blocking seems to be a bit high because I see a lot of pancakes and kick returns are easy. I should of had 2 for TDs but only had 1. Ill explain those stats later.
Lots of offense...

Stats: Cincy Oregon State
Score 48 50
First Downs 23 26
Total Yards: 538 465
Rushes- yrds 22-68 42-247
Passing yrds 470 218
turnovers: 1 1 (both ints)


Player Stats
Cinci
Zach Collaros 31-41 470 yards 5 tds 1 int sacked twice
5 of the incompletions were from screen pass attempts including the int and both sacks

John Goebel 16 rushes 72 yards 4.5 average


Oregon State
Lyle Moevao 15-27 218 yards 1 td 1 int sacked twice

JacQuizz Rodgers: 36 rushes 223 yards 4 tds 6.1 average
Ryan McCants: 4 rushes 48 yards

Blocking:
Peal: 7 pancakes
Croom: 5 pancakes
Catchings: 3 pancakes
JacQuizz Rodgers: 2 pancakes?
7 more team pancakes

Kick Returns:
Catchings: 5 returns 143 yards 29 average
James Rodgers: 3 returns 143 yards 48 average


Seems like the human stats were alright minus the copious amount of pancake blocks. Toning down the human run blocking and the CPU passing attack would be nice. Put those two together and that would equal less scoring, yet still even results
Happy it was a close game .
These will get there
DOSMedia4SC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove