 |
Quote: |
 |
|
|
 |
Originally Posted by LAKE4742 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmmm.....Wow! With all of the positive feedback here, ya'll had me thinking this was actually going to be good.
Ohhhh Noooo. This game is just as spaztaztic as ever. It's STILL a struggle to get them to do a simple jumpshot-nuff said.
THE ENGINE!!!!! THIS HORRENDOUS ENGINE!!!!! The same problem as Madden. EA just doesn't get it. Basing a sports game 90% off of animations is not simulation, not fun, and certainly does not "give the user more control". Use the Havok engine, or...something!! The future is ragdoll physics (like real life), NOT animations. It's so clear.....EA is for the kids, and 2K is for the adults (Was that too much? I can never tell.). I've never played Fifa or NHL, but, those games get alot of praise. Maybe EA should just stick to hockey, and soccer.
I couldn't wait to run back to 2K10 Draft Combine, and its smooooth gameplay-which gives the user TOTAL control.
As easy as this decision is, just imagine how easy it would be to choose a new 2K football game over Madden! 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Wait, Wait, wait a minute, I have yet to play the LIVE demo, I will once again say that the 2k series has been very good to me as to all of us. I have been playing for all 10 years now, and I bought the Combine and I thought it was terrible. When you say Engine, the guys over 2k have had the same engine for years, as it works, it still has felt very robotic, and the combine just proved it again to me this year. I played the combine once and that was it. 2k is just as guilty of having the same tired game engine. I'm sorry buy the jump LIVE has made this year to me is far greater then any jump 2k has made in any year of next-gen.