NBA Live 10 Review - Operation Sports Forums

NBA Live 10 Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fluent2332
    MVP
    • Aug 2005
    • 1735

    #16
    Re: NBA Live 10 Review

    i mean, how can a game get an 8, when the AI is playing with real life DNA? every single player in the game plays like they do in real life. there is no rubber band come-back logic. you never feel cheated, only outsmarted. the game punishes you in an intelligent way for making mistakes, and rewards you tremendously for smart plays. this is all 5 star material to me. i could go on and on....

    Comment

    • Court_vision
      Banned
      • Oct 2002
      • 8292

      #17
      Re: NBA Live 10 Review

      Originally posted by fluent2332
      i don't agree with the score of an 8. in fact most of the reviews that have come out are hovering around the same area. i don't really understand it, because there's so much good in this game, in my opinion, there's no question it outweighs the bad by a large margin. in fact, i'm a huge association/dynasty guy, but this game is so good, i wouldn't even care if there was no dynasty mode at all. i would be perfectly fine with online play, exhibition, and dynamic season. i've never had so fun much playing against the computer, and then taking it online for some sim opponents. i played the same guy about 5 times in a row last night, and every game was crazy. oh don't forget, dynamic season is so overlooked at the moment, it's going to be incredible when the season starts, i'm sure.

      so, considering this is the best basketball game i've ever personally played, i don't understand how it could warrant an 8. to me, it's a 9.5, easy

      the point - anyone looking for a true simulation style basketball game with incredible gameplay that is very rewarding, should choose live, hands down.
      I am really enjoying the game...but 8 is a very fair score for a game with a very generic post game + very poor D.

      I'd grade it like this:

      Perimeter offense A +++
      Permiter defense...C
      Post offense... C
      Post D...no comment.

      Comment

      • fluent2332
        MVP
        • Aug 2005
        • 1735

        #18
        Re: NBA Live 10 Review

        Originally posted by Court_vision
        I am really enjoying the game...but 8 is a very fair score for a game with a very generic post game + very poor D.

        I'd grade it like this:

        Perimeter offense A +++
        Permiter defense...C
        Post offense... C
        Post D...no comment.
        just to comment on defense and the like..
        defense to me is stellar, and very rewarding. you actually have to box out. you have to perfectly time your steals, and you have to time and have great position on your blocks. defense is a 10 in my eyes.

        post offense is reflective of real life post offense, meaning the new breed of big man is not a back to the basket player. yet there is enough diversity in the post to still get the job done. the inside game is also stellar, with bigs dunking when they are supposed to, nice aggressive putbacks, easily scoring over smaller players, and on and on. every big man in the game legitimately scores down low, hustle players get their points on hustle and putbacks, etc.

        the game is such a simulation it's almost ridiculous how on point it is.

        Comment

        • Court_vision
          Banned
          • Oct 2002
          • 8292

          #19
          Re: NBA Live 10 Review

          And here I was think thinking this was a LIVE review thread?

          Why don't you focus on seeing LIVE implement a post game + better D...that would be more constructive in this thread.
          Last edited by Pared; 10-08-2009, 11:01 AM. Reason: Removing off-topic post.

          Comment

          • Court_vision
            Banned
            • Oct 2002
            • 8292

            #20
            Re: NBA Live 10 Review

            Originally posted by fluent2332
            post offense is reflective of real life post offense, meaning the new breed of big man is not a back to the basket player. yet there is enough diversity in the post to still get the job done. the inside game is also stellar, with bigs dunking when they are supposed to, nice aggressive putbacks, easily scoring over smaller players, and on and on. every big man in the game legitimately scores down low, hustle players get their points on hustle and putbacks, etc.

            the game is such a simulation it's almost ridiculous how on point it is.
            I don't want to steal your thunder here bro...but I am here to tell you that, in real life, Tim Duncan and Carlos Boozer have different post moves to Brian Scarlbarine and Greg Oden. In LIVE 10, they don't.

            Let's not get too carrried away here with "9.5" type claims...

            Comment

            • str8artist
              MVP
              • Sep 2009
              • 1070

              #21
              A fair review... 8.0 is perfect from where it has come from.... EA is on there way back. Thanks Steve
              My Artwork

              Comment

              • fluent2332
                MVP
                • Aug 2005
                • 1735

                #22
                Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                Originally posted by Court_vision
                And here I was think thinking this was a LIVE review thread?

                Why don't you focus on seeing LIVE implement a post game + better D...that would be more constructive in this thread.
                i was just addressing the previous poster "bro". the point isn't to bash 2K, it was to answer a question as to why one would think that 2K is on the downslide.
                the game to me is still a 9.5. i could care less that it doesn't have duncans signature turnaround hook that he does once a game. the gameplay is still stellar and it's the best basketball game i've ever played. many others have shared this sentiment. how do we rate a game that is the best we've ever played in the genre. an 8? yet 2k.5 is an 8.5 and is getting higher reviews, when it's not even close to the gameplay and authenticity of it's competitor? makes no sense

                Comment

                • Ballatician
                  Rookie
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 236

                  #23
                  Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                  I say dispense with the numbers and just leave impressions a la pastapadre.

                  Comment

                  • fluent2332
                    MVP
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 1735

                    #24
                    Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                    Originally posted by Ballatician
                    I say dispense with the numbers and just leave impressions a la pastapadre.
                    just numbers to us but to some, the difference between which game they are going to buy. sad but true. i bet mike wang is sitting back like, are these reviews serious?? we make the most accurate basketball simulation ever and 2k still gets higher scores? the world is crazy.

                    team specific styles, ACCURATE PLAYER SPECIFIC PLAYS... wow. the other game doesn't even have plays. i strive to overstand this insanity
                    Last edited by fluent2332; 10-08-2009, 12:50 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Court_vision
                      Banned
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 8292

                      #25
                      Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                      Originally posted by fluent2332
                      i was just addressing the previous poster "bro". the point isn't to bash 2K, it was to answer a question as to why one would think that 2K is on the downslide.
                      the game to me is still a 9.5. i could care less that it doesn't have duncans signature turnaround hook that he does once a game. the gameplay is still stellar and it's the best basketball game i've ever played. many others have shared this sentiment. how do we rate a game that is the best we've ever played in the genre. an 8? yet 2k.5 is an 8.5 and is getting higher reviews, when it's not even close to the gameplay and authenticity of it's competitor? makes no sense
                      Yes, it does make sense. I've got both and one is very complete...post move packages for multiple bigs, very deep dynasty, a tonne of player differentation.

                      Both have their flaws...but neither are a 9.5 type game. Like I said, LIVE's perimer game is an A+++ type game. At the moment, everyone is blown away by how good it is. It's brilliant

                      But...the post game, defense, dynasty etc are all a long way short of the standard set by the perimeter game. 9.5 = all aspects are great. Not just one.

                      Just enjoy the game...both are good this season.

                      Comment

                      • PVarck31
                        Moderator
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16978

                        #26
                        Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                        Originally posted by Ballatician
                        I say dispense with the numbers and just leave impressions a la pastapadre.
                        Child Please

                        Comment

                        • Court_vision
                          Banned
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 8292

                          #27
                          Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                          Originally posted by fluent2332
                          just numbers to us but to some, the difference between which game they are going to buy. sad but true. i bet mike wang is sitting back like, are these reviews serious?? we make the most accurate basketball simulation ever and 2k still gets higher scores? the world is crazy.

                          team specific styles, ACCURATE PLAYER SPECIFIC PLAYS... wow. the other game doesn't even have plays. i strive to overstand this insanity
                          Ummmm...the other game does have plays. Tonnes of them.

                          And i've known Beluba through these forums for around 7 years now...and I'd bet anything that Mike is NOT thinking that.

                          I'd bet he's thinking "the post game, dynasty and bigs differentation does need a lot of work"...and he'll be working hard on those things as a result.

                          Comment

                          • LAKE4742
                            MVP
                            • Aug 2008
                            • 1337

                            #28
                            Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                            A 8 seems low, to me, but an obvious improvement, nonetheless. I know they have a long way to go, but damn. 2K10 got a 8.5 (down from a 9.0 just a year ago). It seems like any b-ball game worthy of a 10 around here will have us playing with real players from our living room!
                            Maybe I'm just not thinking of everything that could be done to deserve the ultimate prize.

                            But still, odd (for both games), considering Madden 10 got a 9.

                            Comment

                            • fluent2332
                              MVP
                              • Aug 2005
                              • 1735

                              #29
                              Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                              Originally posted by Court_vision
                              Yes, it does make sense. I've got both and one is very complete...post move packages for multiple bigs, very deep dynasty, a tonne of player differentation.

                              Both have their flaws...but neither are a 9.5 type game. Like I said, LIVE's perimer game is an A+++ type game. At the moment, everyone is blown away by how good it is. It's brilliant

                              But...the post game, defense, dynasty etc are all a long way short of the standard set by the perimeter game. 9.5 = all aspects are great. Not just one.

                              Just enjoy the game...both are good this season.
                              hey man, don't want to argue or anything, so let's get that out of the way. here's my opinion

                              9.5 does not mean all aspects are great. ever use old music equipment? i'm talking old 70s and 80s stuff, outdated, etc, yet still goes for big money. why? some of that gear only does one simple thing (think a 303 bass for the musically inclined, or 808 drums). it does that one thing so incredibly well that it is still well sought after. some would say it's better to be a master of one thing than a jack of all trades. i would say that live's gameplay is so good that i don't care if the only mode was exhibition and online, it would still warrant a 9.5. i just think that in a basketball game where gameplay reigns supreme, that should be the be all end all of a review. the rest is bells and whistles. if you have no hands, what are you gonna do with bells and whistles? that's where i'm coming from. so we can respectfully agree to disagree.

                              Comment

                              • PVarck31
                                Moderator
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 16978

                                #30
                                Re: NBA Live 10 Review

                                Originally posted by fluent2332
                                hey man, don't want to argue or anything, so let's get that out of the way. here's my opinion

                                9.5 does not mean all aspects are great. ever use old music equipment? i'm talking old 70s and 80s stuff, outdated, etc, yet still goes for big money. why? some of that gear only does one simple thing (think a 303 bass for the musically inclined, or 808 drums). it does that one thing so incredibly well that it is still well sought after. some would say it's better to be a master of one thing than a jack of all trades. i would say that live's gameplay is so good that i don't care if the only mode was exhibition and online, it would still warrant a 9.5. i just think that in a basketball game where gameplay reigns supreme, that should be the be all end all of a review. the rest is bells and whistles. if you have no hands, what are you gonna do with bells and whistles? that's where i'm coming from. so we can respectfully agree to disagree.
                                I think this is the best basketball game I have ever played. But a 9.5? come on man. The closest sports game to a 9.5 would be the Show. And that is a 9 at best.

                                Comment

                                Working...