All I was pointing out was that the photo does not look like that in game. And 2K back with 2K6 and 7 were known on the web to doctor the photos.
I have the game right in front of me, popped it in just for arguments sake, and low and behold, does NOT look like the photo.
Just don't want people getting caught in this delusion of grandeur that the game was some holy grail graphically by the early 2K shots that do not represent the actual product in comparison to 2K10.
They do it enough on here with the MVP series, don't need it done with 2K7, the game was decent, but far from solid or anything close to viable. It had some better graphics going for it, but that is just about it. And it was my game of choice back in 07.
But people have to get defensive as if I put down their mommas, and others have to act hypocritical.
Anyhow, back on subject. Like others have said, the game looks good enough, it is how it plays that matters. And if not solid sim, then not worth the time IMO. I am jonesin for two games to play, one through the season and one in the off season on my PC gaming rig. I miss the days of 4-5 games to choose.
And there is no problems with slight criticism of photos of 2K10 like the equipment and bats. They are here to discuss. Outright bashing of them is one thing with silly nitpicks, but saying things they can improve upon is another. And should be warranted. Just how I see it.
Comment