Operation Sports Forums - View Single Post

guttertalk · 02-22-2010, 05:16 PM

I'm playing All American using Oraeaon1224's sliders. The problem I'm seeing is that I'm dominating the conference and FCS by the 5-7th year. At one point, I was 55-0 with 3 straight BCS championships. I started with a B team in the Big 12. The problem seems to be that the Big 12 teams, except for tu somewhat, cannot consistently recruit at the level that I do. (I started with a 2-star school.) Consequently, they're giving me no competition and almost no B12 team has been ranked the last 3-4 ranked.

Am I right to blame the limited competitive dynasty on recruiting?

2-3 other teams seem to recruit consistently well and actually give me decent games when I play them--Notre Dame and Michigan. Even if I limit my recruiting (such as no more than 2 5-stars and 6 4-stars), there's no guarantee that the other teams will recruit better and continue to be competitive.

Any suggestions on keeping dynasties competitive more than 4 or 5 years?

02-22-2010, 05:16 PM	#1
guttertalk Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Aug 2009	Keeping dynasties competitive I'm playing All American using Oraeaon1224's sliders. The problem I'm seeing is that I'm dominating the conference and FCS by the 5-7th year. At one point, I was 55-0 with 3 straight BCS championships. I started with a B team in the Big 12. The problem seems to be that the Big 12 teams, except for tu somewhat, cannot consistently recruit at the level that I do. (I started with a 2-star school.) Consequently, they're giving me no competition and almost no B12 team has been ranked the last 3-4 ranked. Am I right to blame the limited competitive dynasty on recruiting? 2-3 other teams seem to recruit consistently well and actually give me decent games when I play them--Notre Dame and Michigan. Even if I limit my recruiting (such as no more than 2 5-stars and 6 4-stars), there's no guarantee that the other teams will recruit better and continue to be competitive. Any suggestions on keeping dynasties competitive more than 4 or 5 years?