Major League Baseball 2K10 Screenshots: Team Ratings

[MikeTho22]

I'm assuming that the Tigers rating is without Damon right... ?

[Checmate101]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

smh @ our pitching rating..I'ma have to change that

[500Feet]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

I don't understand how some teams have batting and pitching ratings in the 60s and an overall in the 70s. How does that equate ?

[DirtyJerz32]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

I like it! Number 28 is coming along nicely! Rubbing hands together with my evil laugh...

[Sportsforever]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

I don't understand how some teams have batting and pitching ratings in the 60s and an overall in the 70s. How does that equate ?

I think it's because defense factors in and it's not shown (at least I hope so).

[500Feet]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

I think it's because defense factors in and it's not shown (at least I hope so).

Right right, that thought crossed my mind..

[12]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

So the Rangers went down from a 90 to an 86 from that list of team ratings to this? Alrighty then.

Yeah, not real sure why but, an 86 seems right on. 90 was a bit too high...

[JoeCoolMan24]

Yankees 97 overall
Red Sox 96 overall
Phillies 90 overall


Seriously? Talk about overrated the Yankees/Red Sox, or underrating a lot of other teams, there is no way its that big of a gap there. And White Sox pitching an 81? Yeah right, that puts them at like what, 9th best pitching? They are a top 4 team pitching wise, no doubt. And how are the Twins an 88 overall? WTF? Are they a top 5 team or what?

[WarDawg58]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

The Yankees look just right to me.

[cubsfan203]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

Yeah, not real sure why but, an 86 seems right on. 90 was a bit too high...

The original ratings were spot on. The Rangers are projected to be the 6th best team in the MLB this year, and they were right around that with the 90.

Oh well, I'm sure we'll have people here that will be fixing the rosters anyways. Just hope they aren't as biased as the 2k people obviously are.

[reyes the roof]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

I'm a die-hard, but realistic Mets fan. 75 is just silly. If the Nationals are a 73 and, just as a reference, the Orioles are an 84, the mets at 75 is just low. 82, I think.

Yeah that Orioles rating seems way off, and the Nationals either are rated too high or the Mets and Marlins are too low. No way should those three teams be separated by only four points

[12]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Team Rating Screenshots

The original ratings were spot on. The Rangers are projected to be the 6th best team in the MLB this year, and they were right around that with the 90.

Oh well, I'm sure we'll have people here that will be fixing the rosters anyways. Just hope they aren't as biased as the 2k people obviously are.

Really? I understand optimism, but a 90 always felt too high for the Rangers to me. The Mariners are an 80 overall and I think that's fair. Some people said it was too low. Some people said the Mariners were a top five team and I'm not buying that quite yet. Adding Lee was huge, but the lineup is going to have to overachieve IMO, and our pitching is going to have to be lights out. Could happen, but with some of these teams, I think we need to see some sustainability before we give them an A- overall rating.

Not trying to argue, but I thought the ratings were not bad, except for a few. The Rangers should be pretty dang good though, especially if Hamilton bounces back like I think he will.

[NFCBeast55]

The original ratings were spot on. The Rangers are projected to be the 6th best team in the MLB this year, and they were right around that with the 90.

Oh well, I'm sure we'll have people here that will be fixing the rosters anyways. Just hope they aren't as biased as the 2k people obviously are.

With what pitching are the Rangers going to be the 6th best team...from what I recall, they lost Kevin Millwood and Marlon Byrd (two big contributors in 2009) and didn't add too much.

[12]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Screenshots: Team Ratings

With what pitching are the Rangers going to be the 6th best team...from what I recall, they lost Kevin Millwood and Marlon Byrd (two big contributors in 2009) and didn't add too much.

Not a Rangers fan but, they did add Rich Harden, Vlad Guerrero (who absolutely rakes in that stadium), Colby Lewis and Darren Oliver. That's pretty solid. Harden has injury concerns, but if he can stay healthy that's huge, and Vlad, while getting older, can still mash. Especially in that stadium. Lewis gives them a good #3.

Again, not a Rangers fan, but I think they got better this offseason, not worse. I still think they should be rated anywhere from 83-86, though.

[Blazzen]

Re: Major League Baseball 2K10 Screenshots: Team Ratings

The Braves pitching was a bit low. I think Tim Hudson Rated at 78 is ridiculous too. Jair deserves the 84, Tommy Hanson should be an 80-82 as he doesn't have a full major league season under his belt yet. Huddy should be at least an 80, if not 84-85.

Derek Lowe dropping to 77 is a bit harsh too. He did win 15 games. ERA was high due to 3 or so games where he got SHELLED and it ruined his era the rest of the year. That's why he had a mid 4 era but still won 15 games. Derek Lowe @ 80 is about right.

Peter Moyland should get some more love too. Kris Medlen is not on par with Moyland.