View Single Post
Old 03-04-2010, 11:12 PM   #304
Knight165
*ll St*r
 
Knight165's Arena
 
OVR: 56
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 24,986
Blog Entries: 1
Re: MLB '10: The Show - Franchise Issues Update

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Chef
Sounds like a damn good find and an excellent way to avoid the trades issue so many have been complaining about. I have to ask though, is there any downside to this at all, in your opinion of course? It seems like it would solve it all, no need to consistently check the pending trades, no need to worry about the CPU making dumb roster moves etc.
I'm still looking.
At first offer...I was so disappointed(unwarranted)...as I thought the offer was 2 players from DET to my Mets...they were two players from Seattle or somewhere...so I'm thinking that the trades were done "behind my back".....then I saw the team on top of the trade box and realized what was happening.....and it was a GOOD thing!
Can some other guys try this?....and post if anything is a downside to this.
So far to me...it looks like the best of both worlds...controlling trading for everyone...but STILL getting the CPU to offer trades.
Add this to possibly fixing some of the contracts and we could have a workable franchise to use right away.

M.K.
Knight165
__________________
All gave some. Some gave all. 343
Knight165 is offline