Yes and no. If you're talking about features, I would agree.
Where I disagree is the area of quality assurance. Regardless of what was included or not included, we had a game released under one full year of his watch that was so bug-riddled that we had to wait four months and two patches to get a "final" build of the game that--even then--had franchise stats that are messed up.
So in essence, had a glorified beta for four months at a $60 retail price. Some were ok with that, many weren't.
You'll always have people that will express frustration over the lack of progress that they believe the game should have--that's a given. People will always want more features and some will loudly gripe about not having them.
But what REALLY ticks people off is getting the game after all the hype, marketing, etc., then browsing the forums for months later wondering "Is the patch out yet?" for stuff that IS in the game, especially (in some instances) functionality that's been in the game for YEARS.
Citing my example above (franchise stats), Madden has had the franchise feature for over 10 years now, and you're telling me that on the 6th iteration of the current generation console, this wasn't functioning correctly? Seriously?
They're going to put whatever features they want in the game. I'll like some of them and won't like others. But whatever IS in there, should work correctly.
I don't begrudge the usual apologists who will defend these things. But they shouldn't begrudge the skeptics, so long as the skeptics post in a mature manner.
Like I said before, after all these years there is no "early" anymore.

Comment