Man, I didn't think there was any way that this news would be received with negative responses. The same usual suspects seem to manage to turn every positive into a negative, smh.
I am not an easy sell, but the explanation that last year's team did in fact prioritize (and improve) locomotion but ran up against a tech limitation seemed pretty straightforward and believable to me. No way you can argue that '10 was as bad as '09 with regard to movement.
The implementation in '11 kind of dispels de facto the notion that they're making this all up somehow and that none of this will actually get into M11 or make a positive difference.

Comment