This is VERY cool. I really like this idea a lot, and it's something that seems fairly simple from a development standpoint that could add value immediately.
Dynamic Rivalries
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Dynamic Rivalries
This is VERY cool. I really like this idea a lot, and it's something that seems fairly simple from a development standpoint that could add value immediately.13-Time World Champions: 1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1996, 2010
#GoPackGo -
Re: Dynamic Rivalries
Great thread. Along with this idea I believe you should be able to create some options for your rivalry.
If you want to have your rivalry be on thanksgiving weekend, you should be able to click it.
If you want it to be a neutral site game, you should be able to click it.
It makes it feel more permanent and real to have the rivalry game played the same time every year or have it played in a neutral site.
For example, if I was controlling FSU, and I decided to make the rivalry with Clemson a neutral site game in Atlanta every year in October.Comment
-
Re: Dynamic Rivalries
that is a really cool idea too.
although, im concerned with how rivalries are scheduled now, without this feature!
i've played seasons in the mountain west where byu and utah play 2 or even 3 games after their match-up... when in real life, they ALWAYS play eachother last. i've seen the same thing with mich-ohio state too.13-Time World Champions: 1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1996, 2010
#GoPackGoComment
-
Re: Dynamic Rivalries
This is an awesome idea. The rivalry games now have no impact as far as when you play so this would definitely beef up the fun factor. Nice.Win, Lose, or Tie. I'll be a Georgia Fan 'til I Die. GO DAWGS!Comment
-
-

Comment