Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

[Matt Diesel]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

Real World Performance 2008-2009 season vs Madden 09 ratings, for comparison:

Patriots 97 (11-5)
Cowboys 96 (9-7)
Chargers 95 (8-8)
Colts 95 (12-4)
Giants 94 (12-4)
Steelers 94 (12-4)
Jaguars 93 (5-11)
Packers 91 (6-10)
Patriots 97 (11-5)
Cowboys 96 (9-7)
Chargers 95 (8-8)
Colts 95 (12-4)
Giants 94 (12-4)
Steelers 94 (12-4)
Jaguars 93 (5-11)
Packers 91 (6-10)
Eagles 91 (9-6-1)
Bucs 91 (9-7)
Vikings 90 (10-6)
Browns 88 (4-12)
Redskins 88 (8-8)
Seahawks 87 (4-12)
Saints 87 (8-8)
Panthers 86 (12-4)
Broncos 84 (8-8)
Titans 84 (13-3)
Bills 82 (7-9)
Ravens 81 (11-5)
Bengals 80 (4-11-1)
Bears 80 (9-7)
Cardinals 78 (9-7)
Texans 78 (8-8)
Lions 78 (0-16)
Rams 77 (2-14)
Jets 76 (9-7)
49ers 72 (7-9)
Chiefs 71 (2-14)
Raiders 71 (5-11)
Falcons 67 (11-5)
Dolphins 67 (11-5)

[seriousluboy83]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

Does anyone beside me think the Raider should also be in the 60's

[KaptnKirk12]

I really fail to see how Oakland is just as good as Kansas City.

Chiefs have easily taken a pretty big step forward improving their extremely young team, while Oakland probably got worse lol.

Luckily updated rosters and everything change this as the season goes on.

[GreenReign86]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

Wow, looking back on the ratings from Madden 09 really makes me reflect on how we ever managed to get by without stretched ratings. The Browns an 88 overall,? NHL developers take note.

[TomBrady]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

Chiefs have easily taken a pretty big step forward improving their extremely young team, while Oakland probably got worse lol.

Roflcopter.
They've added a good QB, had a great draft, and generally got better in allmost every positioon.

[Trademarq]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

Roflcopter.
They've added a good QB, had a great draft, and generally got better in allmost every positioon.

whats funny .. KC ... did the same if not more ... i agree i believe Kc should be higher then Oak ... an Campbell is a slight upgrade .... he's not that good

[jdmsi7]

goood it'll be nice to beat them over and over again

[theD25]

I would say the Lions should be in the 70's with their offseason additions, but lets be serious. They are still and will always be the stumbling mumbling bumbling Detroit Lions.

[Trademarq]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

I would say the Lions should be in the 70's with their offseason additions, but lets be serious. They are still and will always be the stumbling mumbling bumbling Detroit Lions.

iono the lions did more then update there off ...

[joejccva71]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

Donny how in the world are you going to give the Baltimore Ravens a 90, but the Colts a 91? Seriously?

Sorry but the Colts are alot better than the Ravens. It's not even a close measure. The Ravens have a defense thats as old as the stone age, a WR core that is mediocre at best, and a QB that still hasn't proved he can focus, maintain, and win games. I wouldn't even call Flacco a leader yet.

The only thing the Ravens have going for them is their RB core. But they get a 90? An 85 would have been generous.

[JBH3]

Aren't these completely cosmetic though?

[joejccva71]

Re: Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

Aren't these completely cosmetic though?

They are averaged out based on player ratings but still with that being said, how are the Colts only 1 point ahead of the Ravens?

I don't see it. I think about who the Ravens have on their team, and then think about the Colts and then I get all confused.

[Skyliner80]

NYJ 89. psh. I guarantee that next year it will not be that high.

[NavigatorD83]

Madden 11 Horrible Team Cut Scenes Revealed!

[JBH3]

They are averaged out based on player ratings but still with that being said, how are the Colts only 1 point ahead of the Ravens?

I don't see it. I think about who the Ravens have on their team, and then think about the Colts and then I get all confused.

Does EA offer any insight into how they are formulated? Like if the Colts are only 1 pt higher are certain ratings weighted? i.e. defense... w/ more defensive playmakers on BAL maybe the d-players have ratings that are weighted which increase their overall...?

It would be nice if they told us exactly how they calculate these ratings.