NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

[Pared]

Please use this thread specifically for the discussion of ratings, including what you've seen in the demo.

[rocker]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

Would someone please list the speed and acceleration of the OSU receivers?

[icmOU72]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

Heres the problem i see. How does EA judge acceleration? I mean do they actually go and look at player profiles for every single player and look at like three cone shuttle times? I mean for instance if you have a guy that runs a 4.37 forty (which is close to broyles but he is probably a 4.4 flat guy) and he has an 8 second three cone time (Tebow ran a 6.66 time) would they say that he has 96 speed with 85 acc? What about guys that are quick and fast. Two guys have a 4.4 forty, one guy gets to top speed by 10 yards and the other dude by 15 yards are they not the same speed? I know that would be hard to do for a game just curious i guess. Wow it sounds like i am complaining but i am just curious at how they get the numbers.

[Fresh Prince]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

As a Hurricanes fan, lol @ Fortson being rated a 93. He should be an 85 at best, perhaps lower. Maybe a 93 if he could ever stay on the damn field...

[rocker]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

As was stated in the other thread Saine and Herron the OSU rb's are too high at 94 & 92. Quite honestly Pryor at 94 doesn't sit well with me either. It seems a lil high!

[GreenHurricane1]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

Brandon Harris a 88 smh. Forston at 93 is a joke. Aldarius Johnson having our highest speed rating is a joke. Our freshman TE does have 90 speed tho

[Barkley7]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

Brandon Harris is an 88? Dang, I thought he would be higher. I also heard Allen Bailey's a 96. A lil high if you ask me

[BoomerSooner11]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

I haven't played it yet, but I will see if Broyles speed is accurate. I understand they toned down the SPD and it is the ACC you have to pay attention to...I just hope he isn't ridiculously slow.

[buckeye02]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

Herron and Saine at 94&92 seem a bit high to me too. Saine should be the higher ramked of the 2 though.

OSU having 4 freshman? That isnt sitting to well with me. But its just the demo.

[Canes5]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

As a Hurricanes fan, lol @ Fortson being rated a 93. He should be an 85 at best, perhaps lower. Maybe a 93 if he could ever stay on the damn field...

Forston as an impact player is terrible, he doesn't even start. Since when did Jared Campbell become the starting safety over Telemaque. How does Cooper get an 85 speed, I'm not saying he's lightning quick, but our slowest back? How is Aldarius Johnson, a possession receiver, have 96 speed. He should be in the 80s. Allen Bailey with a 65 speed, are you kidding me. It's like they took Miami's depth chart and made everyone who sucked in real life good and everyone who was good suck. Why doesn't EA go to the fanbases to at least figure out which players start and which suck and then EA can go in and put ratings. This is terrible and needs to be fixed.

[FedExPope]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

After seeing the seemingly bloated ratings of OSU I'm surprised that UF's actually seem to be accurate. Andre Dubose is highly touted but is 80 OVR, with good physical abilities. And even though Demps also has very high phys attributes, he's still an 89. Brantley does however seem to be a little high at 86, considering all he ever did was mop up duty. But the other 2 QBs look to be rated appropriately...maybe the dev team really thinks the OSU players are as good as they perceive them? I'm noticing a lot of discrepancy between the real roster and this one - for example, the 6' 308lb DT in the game, #99, is 91 overall and is an impact player. But on the ESPN site, the same number & height/weight applies to a freshman. This player is listed as a Junior in the game. I think this is their way of getting around the likeness argument - they seem to intentionally get some of the things wrong about players, to make it a more viable defense if they ever had to go to court over it. Just how I see it.

[rocker]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

Herron and Saine at 94&92 seem a bit high to me too. Saine should be the higher ramked of the 2 though.

OSU having 4 freshman? That isnt sitting to well with me. But its just the demo.

So OSU has 4 Freshmen Rb's? That will slow down my recruiting a good back for a few years. lol I wonder if Rod Smith will even be on the team in the fall. What speed/accel did they give Carlos Hyde?

[osubucksfan47]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

OSU has 4 freshman total, Saine and Herron aren't freshman.

[rocker]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

4 total? Wow that is weak.

[Playmakers]

Re: NCAA '11 Ratings Discussion

After seeing the seemingly bloated ratings of OSU I'm surprised that UF's actually seem to be accurate. Andre Dubose is highly touted but is 80 OVR, with good physical abilities. And even though Demps also has very high phys attributes, he's still an 89. Brantley does however seem to be a little high at 86, considering all he ever did was mop up duty. But the other 2 QBs look to be rated appropriately...maybe the dev team really thinks the OSU players are as good as they perceive them? I'm noticing a lot of discrepancy between the real roster and this one - for example, the 6' 308lb DT in the game, #99, is 91 overall and is an impact player. But on the ESPN site, the same number & height/weight applies to a freshman. This player is listed as a Junior in the game. I think this is their way of getting around the likeness argument - they seem to intentionally get some of the things wrong about players, to make it a more viable defense if they ever had to go to court over it. Just how I see it.

nope a lot of their ratings are based off how they assigned previous IMPACT players from those schools at the same posistion

i've followed them closely the last 3 years and sure enough you'll find a guy from Madden that left NCAA football and and year later someone else will take that players ratings if they are expected to be an IMPACT player.

But then again it's probably the best way to determine ratings for EA since they can't possibly know how to give 3000+ atheletes an accurate rating

If Virginia Tech has an athelete at QB that is a IMPACT player EA will revert to using the same ratings they assigned Mike Vick in one of their Madden games with only slight modifications