NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

[cparrish]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

Colorado looks about right at B-. The question I want to know; if I am reading the rankings correctly, is how in the world is Nebraska's offense an A-? Their defense is what carries them right now, not their offense.

[TheGamingChef]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

Damnit...I wanted to use Vandy in my OD....it's C teams or lower....now I gotta rethink my strategerie (I know it's misspelled, was trying to be goofy)

There are no BCS conference schools rated C OVR or lower. However, there are six BCS schools that got C+ ratings OVR:

Connecticut
Duke
Illinois
Louisville
Syracuse
USF

Nearly half of the Big East!

[dan_457]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

Colorado looks about right at B-. The question I want to know; if I am reading the rankings correctly, is how in the world is Nebraska's offense an A-? Their defense is what carries them right now, not their offense.

This is looking like a trend, maybe they wanted to lower the average defensive ratings for all teams.

[NDFan1029]

Wisconsin is rated way too high. I mean, even Connecticut had a higher ranking recruiting class than Wisconsin. UNC is way overrated...those are the kinds of ratings you would expect their basketball team to have. Rutgers is a B+?? C'mon. I know they went 9-4 last year, but 3 of those wins were against Div. 2 schools, and they were awful in the Big East. Oregon State and Oregon should not have identical ratings..they clearly aren't equally talented. Purdue should not be ranked that high...they were 5-7 last year. I think Navy deserves a little more credit than their C+ average. Everything else is passable, but the ones I mentioned are pretty off.

[NDFan1029]

There are no BCS conference schools rated C OVR or lower. However, there are six BCS schools that got C+ ratings OVR:

Connecticut
Duke
Illinois
Louisville
Syracuse
USF

Nearly half of the Big East!

Connecticut is ranked pretty low if you asked me. They were a few major league chokejobs away from a 10 win season last year.

[TaylorClan02]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

I'm a Gopher fan and I certainly don't agree with the B rating....I was thinking closer to a C

[JAKEHB20]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

I agree with the Badgers rating. Everyone will agree with me by seasons end. Oh and NDFan1029, since when does recruiting ranking effect team ratings????

[Landlordos7]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

Nebraska's offensive rating is a laugh. Don't get me wrong, I think we'll be good on offense, but outside of the Holiday Bowl and Sun Belt teams our offense deserves to be rated about a C-.

[gofresno]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

The ratings seem to really be based off of strength of conference. I think Fresno State's ratings are just about right, but some comparable schools are rated a too high/low. IMO

[hawkeyebred2332]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

Already been said but yeah Iowa is pretty off. Offense and defense should be flipped. B+ defense when it returns 8 starters from a top 10 D? Iowa's D is comparable to OSU and they are A.

And if I remember right the D-line was something like 91, 89, 81, 78 on teambuilder....keep in mind that is the same D-line that many publications have as best in the nation.

[osubeavs721]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

How is washington a B+??? they will be lucky to finish in the top 5 in the pac 10 this year. Jake Locker isnt even that good. He can throw vs bad teams but OSU, Oregon, USC and Stanford shut the guy down, Arizona too.

[boritter]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings

As a Colorado fan I can confirm that CU's B- B- B- rating is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too high.

The truth hurts.

[chicubsfan20]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings

Did you see the field conditions in that game. If it was any different that game would not have been close. Wis is alittle too high mabey B+

These rating are base off of the rosters in TeamBuilder and we all know they are crap. Rutgers is missing just about everyone lol. Ratings and Players are pretty bad.

That came should have been a lot more spread out than it was. Wisconsin dominated Miami. Who cares about the field condition, yeah it was a problem, but then again both team were on the same field, no excuses. Wisconsin showed they can stop speed.

[Shawnj86]

looks nice

[Whoman]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Team Ratings (A Few Are Missing)

all way too high. Why not use the A-F scale to full extent ?