NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[gocards055]

Re: E3 NCAA Football 11 "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Arkansas 3 Stars
90-96-85 (Ovr-O-D)

Auburn 5 stars
87-89-88

Arkansas D needs to go way down.

[J-Unit40]

Re: E3 NCAA Football 11 "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Bama had 490 yards of offense on the Florida D in the SEC Championship, your question is what?

So they are a 99 on offense based on ONE game in 2009?

You still can't be serious. 98-99 should be reserved for offensive juggernauts that come once or twice in a decade. Not Alabama in 2010.

We see this every year with EA. UGA was loaded with 99s not too long ago and we all know how that turned out.

Big picture: Not a big deal. Just found it comical.

[MWillard2]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

I don't understand why Cal is a 3-star program and yet UCLA is a 4-star.

[o 99 PROBL3MS o]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Thanks a lot guys! I was hoping they didnt overrate arkansasl defense so i can build it in dynasty. Only if they would have added their new Nike uniforms it would be on.

[notoriouzwun]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

ASU looks okay. I wont argue over 1 or 2 pts on defense. SO basically where i thought they would be. Considering after seeing the new TB rosters and Steven Threet was an overall 59 lol

[The GIGGAS]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Alright, before I start a dynasty, I'm going to wait for a rerated roster by someone.

[MWillard2]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Alright, before I start a dynasty, I'm going to wait for a rerated roster by someone.

Ill be doing that on PS3 most likely. I usually have the roster totally re-rated for every team by a month after the game released.

[Matt Diesel]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Pretty impressive Boise State is a 5 star program after only 10 years in FBS.

[str8artist]

looks good, but editing will be the first thing I do before I start my dynasty. 99 for any team is a no no in book.

[Gosens6]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Jesus could that guy be scrolling any faster?

[Swat_21]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

So much butthurt ITT. It's so funny.

[bama4111]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

bama only lost 1 crucial player on offense and that was Colin Peek. Other than that we lost 2 Oline and a WR that didnt play much at all. We have a smart QB, 2 of the best backs in college football, Potentially a great WR in Jones if he can get his catching straight and 3 returning starters on the oline, and a couple of TE's that have game experience so bama should be up in the high 90's on offense

[NEOPARADIGM]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Big Michigan fan here, but them still being six-stars after the last two seasons is, um, noteworthy. I was really expecting a drop down to five. Not that I don't still consider them a top-flight program, obviously they are, but in the game if you start with a six-star team and go 3-9 and 5-7, you're not still six stars that third season, are you?

And Notre Dame? Six stars again? Same logic as above: yeah, Notre Dame's Notre Dame, but they haven't been "NOTRE DAME" in like 15 years.

Chalk up another vote for more customization: would be cool if we could manually set team prestige before starting a Dynasty.

[Nbanflguy]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

How is Minnesota a 85? I love my team, but there is no way we are only 1 overall worse than notre dame.
And we are an 87 on offense when we had the last offense in the Big 10 last year and lost Eric Decker!

[o 99 PROBL3MS o]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

bama only lost 1 crucial player on offense and that was Colin Peek. Other than that we lost 2 Oline and a WR that didnt play much at all. We have a smart QB, 2 of the best backs in college football, Potentially a great WR in Jones if he can get his catching straight and 3 returning starters on the oline, and a couple of TE's that have game experience so bama should be up in the high 90's on offense

Come on man are you really trying to make a case for Bama as the best offense in college football? Colin Peek was Bama's best WR in my opinion. You think Bama's offense should be rated higher than Arkansas' in the game?

QB- ARK
RB- Bama
OL- Split (Bama has better run blockers and Ark has better pass blockers)
WR- ARK
TE- ARK