Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings
LOL @ the Central Florida homerism. 3 stars, 83 overall. That's equal prestige to Arkansas, Cal, South Florida, Texas Tech, etc. Could they at least pretend they're not homers? Yikes. That's a solid 2 star program, who are 26-25 in a bad conference over the last 4 years. But that's the same level as Cal? Laughable.
Cal being 3 stars is pretty bad. They're a 4.
99 on offense, and defense? Come on now. That's not a 99 offense. Defense...eh, maybe.
TCU's numbers seem reversed. They're not a 96 on O and an 88 on D. Their D is among the best in the country just about every year. The offense is decent. Reverse those numbers and it's right on.
As usual, the ratings and the rankings are completely out of sync. Got an unranked team rated a 90. Got a ranked team at 80. This is part of why the rankings system has always been bad in the dynasty.
These are predictably bad, and need to be massively re-edited before a dynasty can be played.
LOL @ the Central Florida homerism. 3 stars, 83 overall. That's equal prestige to Arkansas, Cal, South Florida, Texas Tech, etc. Could they at least pretend they're not homers? Yikes. That's a solid 2 star program, who are 26-25 in a bad conference over the last 4 years. But that's the same level as Cal? Laughable.
Cal being 3 stars is pretty bad. They're a 4.
99 on offense, and defense? Come on now. That's not a 99 offense. Defense...eh, maybe.
TCU's numbers seem reversed. They're not a 96 on O and an 88 on D. Their D is among the best in the country just about every year. The offense is decent. Reverse those numbers and it's right on.
As usual, the ratings and the rankings are completely out of sync. Got an unranked team rated a 90. Got a ranked team at 80. This is part of why the rankings system has always been bad in the dynasty.
These are predictably bad, and need to be massively re-edited before a dynasty can be played.
Comment