NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[AUChase]

I hate Alabama as much as the next guy, but there's no sense in attacking an entire fan base because a few ignorant people. Alabama should be somewhere around 94-96 offensively imo. Let's not get this discussion off topic before it starts..

[thaima1shu]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

3 Stars

89 OVR - 93 O - 88 D

Not sure I agree with the D being that high, but time will tell.

Thanks. I was hoping we would be 4 stars but that was a longshot. And yeah that D rating does seem a bit high.

[RamblinWreck21]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Georgia Tech's defense is 89? What the? I would have given them like a 74....90 on offense seems about right losing Thomas and Dwyer, but we got lucky on D. I'll take it though.

[notoriouzwun]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

That is an absolute joke. Arizona State is very weak this year and Arizona is returning several key playmakers from a 2nd place finish in the PAC 10. The Wildcats are very deep at several positions as well. Scratching my head as well there.

I think its about even. Offensively you all ar superior to us. Defensively we are superior to you. Special teams wise, return wise you guys are better, kicking and punting we are better. You are the "evil twin". Now that Olson is gone as our O-Coordinator and Danny Suckyvan is gone, our offense should be much improved.

[rdfowler]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Georgia Tech's defense is 89? What the? I would have given them like a 74....90 on offense seems about right losing Thomas and Dwyer, but we got lucky on D. I'll take it though.

seriously dude it wasnt really the defense, it was scheme and bad coaching ratings are based off talent of the players not the output shown in real life.(example UGA in ncaa 2009 prob over rated but was still one of the top talented teams in the nation that year) our offense does neeed to be higher because our ratings do no reflect a ranking of 12 as its shown on the game and i do believe in real life that tech is a #10 - #15 kind of team

[jmik58]

We have more than one returning starter on defense.

I'll give you credit for three returning starters with Hightower, Barron, and Green. Two corner positions and two linebacker positions aren't even clear yet who will start.

Hardly worthy of a 99 rating on D.

[jolson88]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Okay, I'm an Oregon/Oregon State guy and I'm a little bit surprised about a #4 rating for the Ducks. But that may just be me.

Also, sweet, with an overall of 60 (tied for lowest with Eastern Michigan), it looks like Western Kentucky in the Sunbelt will be my rebuild project this year . Though UL Monroe at 64 could be fun as well. Too bad it looks like stadium expansions won't be in this year though . I don't want to be stuck in smaller stadiums after I'm a powerhouse program :/.

[Michgantown]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Cal - 3*
Central Michigan - 3*
What?

[slingblade73]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

I'll give you credit for three returning starters with Hightower, Barron, and Green. Two corner positions and two linebacker positions aren't even clear yet who will start.

Hardly worthy of a 99 rating on D.

Obviously you have not been paying attention to our recruiting. Re-load....

[jmik58]

I think its about even. Offensively you all ar superior to us. Defensively we are superior to you. Special teams wise, return wise you guys are better, kicking and punting we are better. You are the "evil twin". Now that Olson is gone as our O-Coordinator and Danny Suckyvan is gone, our offense should be much improved.

I'm just speaking from the perspective of an outsider who has done research on both teams. I assume you're talking as an ASU fan, but I definitely disagree on them being even. ASU had a very good defense last year but only four guys return so that will likely fall off. The offense returns three for an offense that was 8th in the PAC 10.

Arizona on the other hand returns seven on offense and should improve on their 5th in the PAC-10 scoring numbers. Defensively they will struggle a little, especially at linebacker.

ASU needs their defense to be competitive, and only won 4 games with it last year. The D is gone this year, so it could be worse.

Arizona is easily two scores better in a head to head matchup.

[moylan1234]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

western kentucky's roster here i come!

[jmik58]

Obviously you have not been paying attention to our recruiting. Re-load....

How much attention have you paid to any other team's recruiting other than Alabama's over this same period of time? Everyone else is "re-loading" as well in their own way. If a good recruiting class is all it takes to compensate for losing 7 or 8 starters then why do average recruiting teams win a lot of games, and why do teams with lots of talent lose?

Too many other factors involved to just say you're worthy of a 99 rating or that your defense is going to be the best just because of recruiting.

[jmik58]

#10 Iowa - 4* - 89 ovr, 92 off, 89 def

Wow... Hawkeyes have a LOT to prove on offense, and the defense (other than linebacker) is one of the best in the nation.

[BAMAJD]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

I don't think we should have all 99's. Ive noticed a lot of the new bama users on here are half ********.

I'll give Alabama an 94 or 95 on offense because we have tons of talent & experience on that side of the ball. Defense i'll give us a 94 or 93 we lost some in the secondary but everything else is just reloaded & in some cases better than last year.

[jeremym480]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Alabama fans seem to be the only ones here who don't recognize how dumb these ratings are. crazy homerism.

That's not entirely true. Bama fan here and I don't think that they deserve a 99 in Offense or Defense. However, I said this last year and I will say it again this year.... just about every team and just about every player is rated too high.

Whatever happened to stretched ratings?

I hate Alabama as much as the next guy, but there's no sense in attacking an entire fan base because a few ignorant people. Alabama should be somewhere around 94-96 offensively imo. Let's not get this discussion off topic before it starts..

Thanks man.