NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[MWillard2]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

I hate Alabama as much as the next guy, but there's no sense in attacking an entire fan base because a few ignorant people. Alabama should be somewhere around 94-96 offensively imo. Let's not get this discussion off topic before it starts..

You wanna know how i know your not a real Auburn fan. Being nice to Alabama. At all times you should be with those fans.

haha just messing

[Tovarich]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Okay, I'm an Oregon/Oregon State guy and I'm a little bit surprised about a #4 rating for the Ducks. But that may just be me.

Also, sweet, with an overall of 60 (tied for lowest with Eastern Michigan), it looks like Western Kentucky in the Sunbelt will be my rebuild project this year . Though UL Monroe at 64 could be fun as well. Too bad it looks like stadium expansions won't be in this year though . I don't want to be stuck in smaller stadiums after I'm a powerhouse program :/.

Our big brother in Eugene's rating/ranking would likely go down if Masoli wasn't most likely on the roster since that happened too late to remove him. Might not be significant, but it would make a difference.

[mkam89]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Cal - 3*
Central Michigan - 3*
What?

I think the 3 stars are the most screwed up.
MSU - 3*
UCF - 3*
USF - 3*
Tulsa - 3*
Really?

Most the 3* in BCS conferences should probably be 4* except like Northwestern, Kentucky, Kansas and a few others

[jmik58]

I don't think we should have all 99's. Ive noticed a lot of the new bama users on here are half ********.

I'll give Alabama an 94 or 95 on offense because we have tons of talent & experience on that side of the ball. Defense i'll give us a 94 or 93 we lost some in the secondary but everything else is just reloaded & in some cases better than last year.

Finally some objective insight. Points like this are things I can respect regardless of any little disagreement.

I do think the lack of returners on defense will be a problem, but I also see how it's possible for this year's starters to be just as good or better in time.

[edscott]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Haha

Roll Tide. 99's! No wonder they didn't put us in the demo!

In all seriousness though, I would not argue that Alabama doesn't have a 96-99 offense. We have a heisman trophy winner returning, and a backup that in my opinion is a better running back than he is. QB is a game manager, nothing too spectacular, but he does what he needs to do. Everyone else that's returning has experience, with the exception of one or two OL. I do think it will be the best offense in college football, competition considered, which is the first time I have been able to confidently say that in years, maybe ever.

Defense, I'd give a 90-94 though, just because we have some highly touted, yet unproven players.

And for all you haters, give us a break. It's been a long time since we have been really great in this game, especially in recent years. Last year we were decent, but Florida, Texas, and Oklahoma were just ridiculous. Were people this upset about Florida's rankings last year? They had all A+'s before the edits right?

[spartyon6686]

How is Michigan a higher ranking than Michigan State
1. We are projected like 4th in BT this year they are like 9/11 in the BT.
2. We have beat them like the past few years.
3. We have had a better recruiting class then them this year.
4. Greg Jones
5. Are coach isn't a cheater.

[osubeavs721]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Thanks. I was hoping we would be 4 stars but that was a longshot. And yeah that D rating does seem a bit high.

Um the overall and the offense are WAAAY to high for washington. In the last 3 years they have won 9 games and that includes an 0-12 season. Washington should be no higher than an 85. They wont finish in the top 5 in the pac 10 again this year.

on a side note. Its nice to see oregon state get some respect finally. and get an 89 overall rating with a 92 on offense which should be great this year and an 88 on defense isnt to bad. We have some questions at LB other than that they will be stout.

[UATide]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

................roll tide

[slingblade73]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Haha

Roll Tide. 99's! No wonder they didn't put us in the demo!

In all seriousness though, I would not argue that Alabama doesn't have a 96-99 offense. We have a heisman trophy winner returning, and a backup that in my opinion is a better running back than he is. QB is a game manager, nothing too spectacular, but he does what he needs to do. Everyone else that's returning has experience, with the exception of one or two OL. I do think it will be the best offense in college football, competition considered, which is the first time I have been able to confidently say that in years, maybe ever.

Defense, I'd give a 90-94 though, just because we have some highly touted, yet unproven players.

And for all you haters, give us a break. It's been a long time since we have been really great in this game, especially in recent years. Last year we were decent, but Florida, Texas, and Oklahoma were just ridiculous. Were people this upset about Florida's rankings last year? They had all A+'s before the edits right?

edscott speaks the truth...

[slingblade73]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

All the gatas had no problem when they were lights out....

now a new era...

[PeleDinho]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

These ratings...Made me laugh man haha. WOw....Come on EA.

[PeleDinho]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

All the gatas had no problem when they were lights out....

now a new era...

Yo stfu forreal man. Where did all of these Bama' fans come from to begin with?

"now a new era" Ohh really now? You guys win a NC when arguably the best QB in the country last season gets hurt 1st quarter and still almost let a UT team with a TRUE Fr. pull of a comeback & now you guys run the College world? Come on man, your kid who switches teams every year...

[dan_457]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Yo stfu forreal man. Where did all of these Bama' fans come from to begin with?

"now a new era" Ohh really now? You guys win a NC when arguably the best QB in the country last season gets hurt 1st quarter and still almost let a UT team with a TRUE Fr. pull of a comeback & now you guys run the College world? Come on man, your kid who switches teams every year...

That's what I've been wondering.

[Barkley7]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

LOL @ Alabama. Good luck stopping those beasts online. Boise and TCU seem overrated this year for pounding their conference's oversized highschool teams. What has Boise done the last couple years? Beat up WAC teams and go 3-1 vs Oregon and TCU. Big whoop weirdos.

On a side note, EA overrated Miami. What has Miami's offense done to deserve a 94? Oh, and Washington's offense (93) being higher than Florida's offense (92) is hilarious. I think one of the creators is probably an alum.

[thaima1shu]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Um the overall and the offense are WAAAY to high for washington. In the last 3 years they have won 9 games and that includes an 0-12 season. Washington should be no higher than an 85. They wont finish in the top 5 in the pac 10 again this year.

And 5 of those 9 wins came last year, off of a winless year, with a new coach installing a brand new system. And regarding our offense, it was already pretty decent last year. And now we have 9 returning starters, losing our fullback and Ben Ossai on the o-line (who sucked anyways). A top 5 finish is also quite realistic, and expected, at least to me.