NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[slingblade73]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Uh oh. & I think someone making a fanbase im a member of look dumb is my business.

Dude it is not my fault you have a complex.

[BAMAJD]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Complex what? Unless that means something that I dont know of.

[slingblade73]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Bama's QB was near horrible last year. Unless he turned into Sam Bradford over the summer, I dont think they're deserving of a 99 offense

2009 197–325 60.6 2,508 17-4

[slingblade73]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Complex what? Unless that means something that I dont know of.

Point made, now back to football.

[FedExPope]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

aha, both my teams maxed out. I like how the prestiges are accurate. NC at 4 stars is good, as well as Cal at 3 for instance.

What is this Bama gang crap? One thread doesn't go by without a dispute about a player I swear...then stats are thrown around in an attempt to amaze everybody. >.>

[DaltonT4]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

?
Kentucky should be 2 or 3 star.

You really thank that? A 2* program?

[mkam89]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

You really thank that? A 2* program?

I mean I don't really follow UK football but they're a .500 program with 2 conference titles and continually finish near the bottom of their division. I don't know what would qualify them to be better than a 2*.
I don't have a problem with them being a 3*, but going back to my original statement, I don't see how they UK would even be considered a 4*.

[cecondlife]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

There is too much Balance. Too many teams with
OFF 87 Def 85
or
OFF 80 Def 79

Most schools like FSU last yr had a really good Off but D was horrible. (BTW I like FSU)
Where are the
OFF 88 Def 70
Or
OFF 80 Def 92

Teams that you cant stop but they can't stop you either or Teams that you just cant move the ball on but can't put points on the board.

[BAMAJD]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Point made, now back to football.

Well, I have never heard complex used in any way other than describing something.

[gocards055]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

I mean I don't really follow UK football but they're a .500 program with 2 conference titles and continually finish near the bottom of their division. I don't know what would qualify them to be better than a 2*.
I don't have a problem with them being a 3*, but going back to my original statement, I don't see how they UK would even be considered a 4*.

Kentucky should be a high 3, low 4 area. They have been to 4 bowls in a row and won 3 of em. And this is coming from a Louisville fan who hates Kentucky like no other.

[GatorFan1963]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Kentucky should be a high 3, low 4 area. They have been to 4 bowls in a row and won 3 of em. And this is coming from a Louisville fan who hates Kentucky like no other.

Using bowl games as an argument nowadays isn't saying much considering many teams with .500 records go to bowls. The fact is that Kentucky has been nothing more than a barely above .500 team if you take their records over the past 4 seasons. And of those past 4 seasons they haven't finished above 4-4 in the SEC. So 3* is right where they need to be.

[DLev45]

Slingblade, quit making Alabama fans look bad please.

Secondly, I am really disappointed about Alabama's ratings.

I was really excited at first, as that I have been a huge Bama fan all my life, have a degree from Alabama, and am currently in law school at Alabama. I'm thinking that after owning every NCAA since NCAA 98' with Wuerffel on the cover, Alabama will finally be a Top 5 team on the game when we have usually been ranked 15-25.

Now I'm a big online player, not huge in dynasty, and I have always used Alabama, even when they were unranked, against everyone, including the number 1 ranked cheesers, but now that EA has given them all 99's across the board and made them the GOAT, people are going to assume that I'm only using Alabama because they are #1 rather than being a life long diehard fan and student of the University.

Thank you EA, for already ruining my online experience with my favorite team.

In my opinion, Alabama deserves a 95 on offense and an 87 on defense.

[gocards055]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Using bowl games as an argument nowadays isn't saying much considering many teams with .500 records go to bowls. The fact is that Kentucky has been nothing more than a barely above .500 team if you take their records over the past 4 seasons. And of those past 4 seasons they haven't finished above 4-4 in the SEC. So 3* is right where they need to be.

True, my cards just haven't been in 3 years so it would feel like a great accomplishment lol

[bb09red]

Lol, Did anyone notice that UCF was overated again , having them as the best con-usa rated team over , ECU and Houston. Guess it helps to have EA in your backyard.

[mkam89]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Kentucky should be a high 3, low 4 area. They have been to 4 bowls in a row and won 3 of em. And this is coming from a Louisville fan who hates Kentucky like no other.

I understand their recent bowl success, but who actually knows what goes into prestige? Is it recent success (then how are UM and ND both still 6*)? Is it based on history (then how is Boise a 5*)?