NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[BAMAJD]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

You can not just ban people that you do not agree with. I just posted a video celebrating the gatas...

That's not the reason why. You seem to be bothering everybody on here.

[MJHSpanda57]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

You can not just ban people that you do not agree with. I just posted a video celebrating the gatas...

you give Alabama fans a bad name

[Xaos]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Yeah, I don't get that, either. Wisc's recruiting class was in the mid-80's this past season, I don't understand why they are rated so highly.

What does recruiting have to do anything with the rankings? You keep saying this! IT MAKES NO SENSE. SHUTUP WITH THESE SHENANIGANS !

[MJHSpanda57]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Why do you keep saying "we"?
Are you on Alabamas team?

thank you for that lol. I hate when people do that stuff. "We won the National Championship cuz we're awesome". Nah, they did while you were sitting at home watching.

[Pared]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Good luck telling him that. He needs to just get banned.

You can not just ban people that you do not agree with. I just posted a video celebrating the gatas...

Next post from either of you not on the topic gets carded.

This off-topic garbage ends here.

[BAMAJD]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Well, it looks like a did good on the teams I picked for the ODs im in.

[strock33]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

cincinnati
2008:10-3
2009:12-1
2010 rating: 85-92-81
no love for the nati. i understand the defense but our offense is definately the best in ohio (cincinnati > ohio state).

[peteykirch]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

cincinnati
2008:10-3
2009:12-1
2010 rating: 85-92-81
no love for the nati. i understand the defense but our offense is definately the best in ohio (cincinnati > ohio state).

You lost the mastermind behind the offense, and his second in command.

[TheGamingChef]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

cincinnati
2008:10-3
2009:12-1
2010 rating: 85-92-81
no love for the nati. i understand the defense but our offense is definately the best in ohio (cincinnati > ohio state).

Hahahaha I am glad to have had a great laugh today, thank you for that

[strock33]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

You lost the mastermind behind the offense, and his second in command.

we still have one of the deepest recieving core in the nation. dj woods, armon binns, usc transfer videl hazelton, and top juco reciever kenbrell thompkins. and zach collaros will be better than tony pike this year. when tp got injured last year he only stepped in and threw 1400 yards, 10 touchdowns to only 2 interceptions, and rushed for 350 yards. In my opinion cincinnati's offense will be better this year than they were last year.

[U SWAG]

ya miami 90s in everything

[Deflo_]

Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Congratulations on making yourself look like a complete fool Slingblade, well done!


Gatorbait

[smlmeyer]

Well, let's give them credit for messing up a lot of ratings all over the place instead of just overrating FSU, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, etc. They changed it up! That said Wisconsin needs to be BELOW Iowa. C'mon. 96 offense? Meaning Wisconsin's offense rivals the very best in the lan? Unheard of. That's going down to at least 90. I could deal with like 90 offense and 89 defense, but 96 offense is crazytalk. Also, UNC's defense is apparently shipped in from 1985 Bears land. Didn't EA do the same thing for them last year, just to a lesser degree? Oh, I know. Those guys must be seniors now so you gotta jack up their Awareness to 120. I'm all for saying experience matters but I think it's silly that EVERY senior in the game gets CRAZY Awareness points. It really pads their ratings (see: Christian Ponder, not that he isn't good but c'mon.) and makes them appear to be godlike. Thing is, you start nerfing too many teams without also nerfing the juggernauts and you wind up with too few upsets. I don't know, we'll see.

[smlmeyer]

I wanted to come on and make a sarcastic comment about how I was mad that "Custom Conferences" was tied to the Y button, maybe lighten the mood a bit, but I got swept up as well.

[sinc79]

So they are a 99 on offense based on ONE game in 2009?

You still can't be serious. 98-99 should be reserved for offensive juggernauts that come once or twice in a decade. Not Alabama in 2010.

We see this every year with EA. UGA was loaded with 99s not too long ago and we all know how that turned out.

Big picture: Not a big deal. Just found it comical.

Offense has everyone back. My question is about their defense, how can a defense with like 3-4 returning starters be 99? Must be putting a lot of stock in those underclassmen.