Well, State had ugly uniforms already. I wouldnt think that they would be able to become much uglier, but boy was I proved wrong. The old uniforms look like heaven compared to the ugliness of their new uniforms. The new basketball uniforms, on the other hand, would be nice, but were ruined by the gold outlining. It just looks plain ugly.
NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
Well, State had ugly uniforms already. I wouldnt think that they would be able to become much uglier, but boy was I proved wrong. The old uniforms look like heaven compared to the ugliness of their new uniforms. The new basketball uniforms, on the other hand, would be nice, but were ruined by the gold outlining. It just looks plain ugly.MLB: New York Yankees
NCAAF: Michigan Wolverines
NCAAB: Cincinnati Bearcats
NFL: Houston Texans
NBA: New York Knicks
"Those Who Stay Will Be CHAMPIONS"-Bo Schembechler-R.I.P.
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
From this video i see notre dames whole offensive line is wrong besides the RG trevor robinson. Kerry Keal 56 is an olb Not de. Manti teo 5 is an ILB and Brian smith is OLB. Darrin walls 2 is a starting corner, hes not on. why is kyle Roudoplh not an impact player. these positons better be fixed.Last edited by STLcardz-NDirish; 06-19-2010, 02:00 PM.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned this so far...
This was a cpu v. cpu game and MSU was hiking the ball very quickly. In the demo, the no huddle teams snap it very quickly (often before you can call a defensive play and have your players get set). There was speculation (hope) that maybe this was only in the demo, but in this E3 vid, MSU was snapping it just as quickly.
I was really hoping to see ND's no huddle offense to see if they look at the sideline and stuff, but the video didn't go long enough.
They were still snapping the ball very quickly, though. But it hasn't been an issue in the demo with teams that huddle up.Last edited by HokieB; 06-19-2010, 02:45 PM.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
Eric Gordon not an impact player?Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
I thought the same thing at first, but they aren't running a no huddle. Since it's CPU vs CPU, the game is just skipping over when you would see the play calling screen. You see MSU breaking the huddle before each play.
I was really hoping to see ND's no huddle offense to see if they look at the sideline and stuff, but the video didn't go long enough.
They were still snapping the ball very quickly, though. But it hasn't been an issue in the demo with teams that huddle up.
But maybe this is just some artifact of it being cpu v. cpu.Last edited by jello1717; 06-19-2010, 03:27 PM.Favorite Teams:
College #1: Michigan Wolverines
College #2: Michigan State Spartans (my alma mater)
College #3: North Carolina Tar Heels
NHL: Detroit Redwings
Comment
-
Well, State had ugly uniforms already. I wouldnt think that they would be able to become much uglier, but boy was I proved wrong. The old uniforms look like heaven compared to the ugliness of their new uniforms. The new basketball uniforms, on the other hand, would be nice, but were ruined by the gold outlining. It just looks plain ugly.Comment
-
MSU was really screwed up
1. who the hell is WR # 16 the four recievers are #2 Dell #82 Martin #7 Nichol and # 3 Cunningham.
2. WR # 6 Smith is now a FB
3. Our D is now a 3-4 not a 4-3 why is a TE a impact player WTF EA.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
2. With all the other issue's with MSU's roster in the game I wouldn't expect EA to change his position.
3. idk why Gantt is an impact player (he is rated a 90 ovr though). I would think Cousins would have been. With Ghoslton MSU can freely change from 3-4 to 4-3 (and Gholston is a DE in the game)Comment
-
1. Looks like wr#16 is C.D. Rucker. He dropped a couple easy passes in the 08 Wisconsin game. Not even on listed MSU's spring depth chart. Nichol isn't even in the game.
2. With all the other issue's with MSU's roster in the game I wouldn't expect EA to change his position.
3. idk why Gantt is an impact player (he is rated a 90 ovr though). I would think Cousins would have been. With Ghoslton MSU can freely change from 3-4 to 4-3 (and Gholston is a DE in the game)
On the subject of WR 16, It might be Bennie Fowler. Fowler was #16 in last years game. Oh yeah, didn't Fred Smith change his number to 86 anyway?My Teams:
Michigan State Spartans
Detroit Lions
Georgia Bulldogs
Miami Hurricanes
Teambuilder ID: ttrojan2Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
Usually they just make up numbers for freshmen (Baker was 23 last year), then change them the next year when they find out the actual number. It could still be Fowler but I didn't look for him specifically when TB was live.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
lol they had Richardson as 25....well really nothing to laugh about.... oh wellComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: Michigan St. vs. Notre Dame (K0ACHK)
Hate to pile on the depth chart complaints, but why does EA have Hughes (RB #33) as the starting RB in the spread? Armando Allen has been the starter for multiple years now, I would think that EA could get that right...Comment
Comment