Recommended Videos

Collapse

Madden NFL 11 Full Player Ratings: Indianapolis Colts and Houston Texans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rice_n_gravy
    Rookie
    • Jun 2010
    • 77

    #31
    Re: Madden NFL 11 Full Player Ratings: Indianapolis Colts and Houston Texans

    Originally posted by Peregrinity
    Pollard is definitely underrated. He's going to be the star of that Defensive Back corp.

    I wish Okoye would step his game up. I really thought he could be the starter, but looks like he's just not improving.

    Walter should definitely be in high 70's low 80's. He's also extremely underrated.

    Slaton will definitely improve as far as rating as the season goes on, if Kubiak gives him the chance to run. A lot of fans here in Houston seem to think Ben Tate is going to be the starter, which I think is ridiculous. Kid hasn't even run a single play in the NFL, and they're already calling for him to be the starter after Slaton suffered from the sophomore slump. He's proven he can run in the NFL, now let him do it.

    And AJ is the best WR in the NFL, hands down. Fitz is a very close second, but we'll see what he's really made of this season with Leinart at QB. Fitz has succeeded from having a great QB like Warner, and having Boldin on the other side of the field. AJ has never had a great QB, and never had another big name threat on the other side of the field, and yet he still puts up amazing numbers.
    see what hes really made of? if your a beast wide receiver your a beast

    ala Kyle Orton throwing to Brandon Marshall

    Comment

    • cam21224
      MVP
      • Jun 2008
      • 2032

      #32
      Originally posted by rice_n_gravy
      just because he gets hurt often doesnt mean his overall rating should dip only his injury rating i never get that logic
      So if he goes out and has a career year he will deserve a bump in his ratings but if he misses most of the year again his overall doesn't deserve to go down? Where is the logic in that?

      8 games played, 42 tackles, and 2 int's the past 2 seasons does not warrant an 89.

      When he does play he is a beast. Run stuffer, average in cover, takes risk to land big hits & if he succeds it's usually a reward of forcing a fumble.

      If he was fresh off of his 2007 season then an 89 or higher would be what he deserves but he is not. Right now he is nothing more then an injury prone guy who isn't on the field producing to warrant such a rating, if he was he would deserve a 82-84 at best.
      Horseshoes & HollyWood

      Comment

      Working...