CPU vs CPU Sliders

[zwief]

Just got the game today and the first order of business will be creating good cpu vs. cpu sliders. I am on my first game colorado vs. colorado st. I have it on very slow speed and 10 minute quarters. I dont think 10 minutes is going to work (too long), but we will see. No broadcast cam, but presentation is awesome so far. I am trying to figure out why the dynasties are all a week off on the dates. Week 1 is starting a week earlier than the real season.
Anyways I know several people will be creating sliders so hopefully in a few weeks we will have a good set so we can start our seasons.

[claystone]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

Good to know. I'm a CPU vs CPU player.

Right now i'm trying to figure what is the best tru minutes per quarter. I'm using two "Pro" style teams so the no-huddle doesn't twist the play counts or stats.

[claystone]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

It seems 8 min might be the way to go. In my game after the first quarter both teams combine has a total of 31 plays which is on track for 120 plays.

[MI88]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

Cpu vs cpu player here, I don't have the game yet but how does it play on default setting cpu vs cpu wise?

[LHaze30]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

cpu vs cpu here as well. What level are you testing your sliders on? All-American?

[joejccva71]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

It seems 8 min might be the way to go. In my game after the first quarter both teams combine has a total of 31 plays which is on track for 120 plays.

I just finished a game clay on cpu vs cpu. I was Navy playing against Minnesota and I lost 38-35. Played on All-American with 8 min quarters.

Minnesota play count: 74
Navy play count: 62

Total play count: 136

I think 7 min quarters would be perfect.

[zwief]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

I have started on Varsity right now which is Default. Things I have noticed so far that will be adjusted in my second game. I think the 38-35 game seems high for Navy/Minnesota. I wonder if Varsity will keep the score lower:
1. Running game needs to have longer runs...too many tackles for loss.
2. Turnovers are too high. More fumbles than interceptions.
3. Very slow is the way to go.
4. I think 8 or 7 minute quarters will be the norm
5. Overall, game play is as good as Madden last year, but the pace of the game is a lot better. The plays are not 2 seconds after each other.
6. Will start second game with new sliders in a bit. Will post 1st game stats soon.

[claystone]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

Cpu vs cpu player here, I don't have the game yet but how does it play on default setting cpu vs cpu wise?

I'm using Default on AA with with game play on slow. I also have speed threshold at 100. 8 min quarters.

So far the game is playing fine. I haven't got into sliders yet, because i want to get the time down first.

But right now in the 2nd quarter with 4:00 left to half time.

Maryland: 10 - Colorado: 7

Colorado Passing:
QB #9: 6 FOR 13 / 69yds / 1 TD / 1 INT / 46% Comp

Maryland Passing:
QB #11: 8 FOR 15 / 66yds / 0 TD / 1 INT / 53% Comp
__________________________________________________ ____________
Colorado Rushing:
HB #5: 5 Carries for 12yds / 0 TD / 2.4 Avg.

Maryland Rushing:
HB #23: 15 Carries for 81yds / 1 TD / 5.4 Avg.
HB #8: 2 Carries for 14yds / 0 TD / 7.0 Avg.
__________________________________________________ ____________
Colorado Defense:
Sacks: 0
INT: 1

Maryland Defense:
Sacks: 0
INT: 1

[claystone]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

I just finished a game clay on cpu vs cpu. I was Navy playing against Minnesota and I lost 38-35. Played on All-American with 8 min quarters.

Minnesota play count: 74
Navy play count: 62

Total play count: 136

I think 7 min quarters would be perfect.

In your game was there a lot of no-huddle plays? In my game right now, there hasn't been one which is keeping the game on track for 120 plays.

You really want to play with teams that don't do no-huddles so you can get your bench mark on the best time.

I'll post my results when my game finishes.

[claystone]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

HALF-TIME


Maryland: 10 - Colorado: 10

Colorado Passing:
QB #9: 9 FOR 17 / 112yds / 1 TD / 1 INT / 52% Comp

Maryland Passing:
QB #11: 8 FOR 15 / 66yds / 0 TD / 1 INT / 53% Comp
__________________________________________________ ____________
Colorado Rushing:
HB #5: 8 Carries for 18yds / 0 TD / 2.2 Avg.

Maryland Rushing:
HB #23: 19 Carries for 100yds / 1 TD / 5.2 Avg.
HB #8: 3 Carries for 12yds / 0 TD / 4.0 Avg.
__________________________________________________ ____________
Colorado Defense:
Sacks: 1
INT: 1

Maryland Defense:
Sacks: 1
INT: 1

I'll give the final stats when the game finishes.<!-- / message -->

[zwief]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

Colorado State
This is Varsity 10 minute quarters, very slow speed, speed threshold set at default

Colorado 19, Colorado St. 16

Passing

Colorado State
QB#12 24-38, 241 yds, 1 TD, 2 INT
Colorado
QB#9 18-34, 229 yds, o TD, 1 INT

Rushing

Colorado State
HB#7 27-92, 3.4 avg, 1 TD
QB#12 7 (-34)
HB#2 5-28, 5.6 avg

Colorado
HB#5 33-107, 1 TD
HB#28 10-36,
QB#9 6 -5

Receiving

Colorado St.
HB#7 6-18
WR#8 4-63
WR#23 4-37

Colorado
TE#34- 4-32
WR#21 4-72

Next step will be going to AA and adjusting time.

[zwief]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

Also showing huge glitches in scheduling..some teams are missing games and some are not at the right location. Week 1 starts a week early. Hopefully this gets worked out in a patch.

[claystone]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

AA Setting with default sliders. Speed set to slow. Speed threshold set to 100. 8 min quarters.


Maryland: 24 - Colorado: 37

Colorado Passing:
QB #9: 20 FOR 32 / 381yds / 3 TD / 2 INT / 62% Comp

Maryland Passing:
QB #11: 18 FOR 37 / 265yds / 1 TD / 1 INT / 48% Comp
QB #18: 0 FOR 2 / 0yds / 0 TD / 0 INT / 0% Comp
__________________________________________________ ____________
Colorado Rushing:
HB #5: 23 Carries for 68yds / 1 TD / 2.9 Avg.
HB #28: 2 Carries for 9yds / 0 TD / 4.5 Avg.

Maryland Rushing:
HB #23: 25 Carries for 108yds / 1 TD / 4.3 Avg.
HB #8: 4 Carries for 13yds / 1 TD / 3.2 Avg.
__________________________________________________ ____________
Colorado Defense:
Sacks: 3
INT: 1

Maryland Defense:
Sacks: 2
INT: 2

On 8 min. I had a total of 125 plays.

[bubba4]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

I cannot tell you how happy I am to hear the the pace of the game is better than Madden 10!! I will watch this tread closely until I get the game and I await any sliders you guys come up with. You made my day!
Bubba4

[zwief]

Re: CPU vs CPU Sliders

Game 2 in the books...this game played a lot better and I didn't see a crazy amount of turnovers. I think the speed threshold set at 100 gave the running game an even more realistic feel. 8 minute quarters seems to be the way to go. I also turned off freezing the kicker and home field advantage. It may be also to note that I do not have Colorado or Colorado State as a user team..meaning they are teams outside of my control.


All-American, 8 min quarters, Threshold at 100, no homefield, no ice kicker
Colorado 37
Colorado St. 20

Passing
Colorado 12/23 , 295 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
Colorado State 20/28, 253 yds, 3 TD, 1 INT
Rushing
Colorado St. HB#7 19-99, 5.2, 0 TD, HB #2 5-13, 2.6, 0 TD
Colorado HB#5 33-121, 3.6, 1 TD, QB#9 5- (-7), 1 TD
Receiving
Colorado St. WR#23 4-80,
Colorado WR#21 5-125, 0 TD, WR #6 2-111, 1 TD, TE#34 4-58,

Total Passes: 53
Total Rushes: 70
Field Goal Attempts/Punts: 14

Total Plays: 137