[goalieump413]

Quote: Originally Posted by rjsuperfly66

... It leads back to my initial point, how much of a problem might this be, that low-teams recruiting boards are full of several 5-star and high 4-star players? It might not seem like a big-deal, but it can severely mess up dynasty down the road, as the talent-difference between the top and bottom teams will continue to grow... It gives bottom teams little to no chance of ever become the next "Boise."

But the real problem seems to be that all teams, regardless of their tier, suffer after several seasons. If the talent gap grew between the top and bottom teams in college football, dominant dynasty teams would remain strong while bottom-feeders would also grow in numbers. The middle ground teams would either rise or fall.

But your observation IS a real problem, in that the AI logic defaults towards unrealistic recruiting philosophy, while allowing reasonable talent to have to wait until the other players commit.

Question though... Does this mean that the players that would commit to 1 and 2 star teams simply get washed away? Does anyone know if these guys stay around through the offseason?