Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

I agree with this post....

I'm re-creating him on a huge NCAA Roster file and I have him at 83 speed just a step below your 85

But 83-86 range is where I think Turner belongs based on his combine 40 time

Yeah that is what I determined as well. I think people will be more satisfied when they realize that the game will play MUCH more accurately to the real thing once they edit rosters and use them. I remember how different it was back in the day...LS actually blocking, having to actually read your blocks, having OL that will get to the second level...it really makes a difference.

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

Just another update here:

The RAW attributes have been completed for AZ-CLE and GB. Feel free to check them out and make any comments/suggestions. Thanks.

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

All teams AZ-GB are now complete for those of you who can't wait to see how Tebow graded out LOL.

[angels eclipse7]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

As for Turner, he ran a 4.42 as a freshman in college which was hand-timed. That 4.49 is the best verifiable time I have. I get all of my times from my employer, NFLDS. We have all 6 times that Turner ran at the combine. Remember, you have 2 hand times and one electronic time for every 40 yard dash ran at the combine...which gives you 6 total times. At his pro day in 2004, Turner ran an official 4.50. Now, I always choose the best average time. That means that for every time you have there is a high, low, and average. For Turner, his high was 4.62 and his low was 4.42. His average of all 6 was 4.49. For the pro day, we only have the one electronic time of 4.50. So the way I see it, you can take the 85 SPD rating with the best verifiable average of 4.49, or you can take the 4.50 and make him an 84 speed.

Gotcha. and I like it. But what about this: Turner looks much thinner this year according to most experts and this should cause him to be just slightly quicker. What do you do in these situations?

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

The first thing I do is look at how many years he has been in competition. This is because players can lose as much as .03 on a 40 time per season on the average as some data would suggest. This is his 7th season already, so there should be some signs of decline, but this is not universal to every player. I also look at his weight when he ran that 40 and his weight now. Weight will most likely affect the ACC more than the SPD rating however. When he ran that 40, he weighed 237lbs. As of right now he is still listed at 244 on Ourlads so I doubt that there would be little change.

[Rbk]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

LT and Portis ranked higher than Jackson? Is that supposed to be a joke?


LOL then I didn't see Josh Brown in the top 10 kickers and was about to freak, didn't expect to see him at 1 haha

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

LT is rated the same as Jackson, not above him. According to PFF, Jackson was only the 36th best back last season despite his stats in a poor offense. His primary downfall: blocking ability. LT had far more TDs as well.

Josh Brown is tied for 1st amongst the kickers. He was #1 in 2008 and #5 in 2007 followed by #10 in 2009.

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

All of the Raw attributes (STR, SPD, AGI, ACC, JMP) have been complete for all teams from AZ-NYJ.

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

I want you guys to check out some of the individual attributes from the Raiders....I always knew that Al Davis drafted for speed but this is unreal...check out the skill positions, LBs, and FBs...wow...

http://www.fbgratings.com/members/viewbyrate.php?team=Raiders

[Dog]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

your doing ratings based off of one season according to a website that doesnt use rate stats? (as in 1 drop for every 100 targets as opposed to 10 drops overall)

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

your doing ratings based off of one season according to a website that doesnt use rate stats? (as in 1 drop for every 100 targets as opposed to 10 drops overall)

No, I am doing ratings based off of everything that I can find including scouting reports, combine data, stats, and inside stats....it is as comprehensive without conjecture and opinion as I can get it...

[Dog]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

No, I am doing ratings based off of everything that I can find including scouting reports, combine data, stats, and inside stats....it is as comprehensive without conjecture and opinion as I can get it...

ah i see. it seemed as though you were going off just 2009 stats of players off of pro football focus. which would be insane ha. but good work on the site i just visited it

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

Thanks. I am doing your Eagles right now...should be done within 30 minutes.

[Dog]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

Thanks. I am doing your Eagles right now...should be done within 30 minutes.

nice man lookin forward to it

[DCEBB2001]

Re: Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

Alright, your Eagles are done. Let me know what you think...keep in mind that some of the older player like Vick may be readjusted because of age at the skill position (and sitting in jail). He may wind up closer to AGI, SPD, ACC, JMP equaling 94, 86, 96, 75...but it all depends.