[sniperhare]

Quote: Originally Posted by TT Mc Dre

I'm only gonna chime in once.... I feel what you guys are saying about certain thing being done and not being done... The Baltimore Ravens should have been increased not decreased off of 1 game where Flacco had a bad game but the secondary played lights out for the second straight game.. Then increase should have canceled out the decrease...I knew Flacco would because an 84 (LOL) but he will play his way back to 87 down the road, we all know that... My point is that we can sit here and complain about something that ain't gonna change unless we change it ourselves.. It's either time for a 'COMMUNITY ROSTER" to be done to eleviate this or be prepared to have this happen every roster update and everybody just deal with it... Complaining ain't gonna change anything... Mister_Ravens32, you not coming off like a fan boy at all.. as you already know my Baltimore Ravens topic reflects your exact point.. I have completely redone the secondary without the emphasis of them playing like a top ranked secondary.. These increase/decreases need to be done more like every 3 to 5 games because a player can have one bad game then bounce back have 2 or 3 good games right after, then you end up playing "YO YO" with the ratings.. Together we can make these rosters better or together we can complain about obvious points and do nothing...

Just like during the draft, now we do have a say in the ratings. Instead of the captains that have been submitting the ratings updates, we can now vote to increase or decrease player ratings.

An idea that was said on the EA forum to make people register with their gamertags and limit people to 5 increases for their favorite team seems like a good idea to me.

Anyway, here's the link.

http://maddennfl.easports.com/weeklyRatings.action