Dynamic updates ... too difficult?

[DJ]

I thought this was a nice feature in NCAA Basketball 10, where each week we'd get updated rankings for the teams. I think (not sure, someone correct me if I'm wrong), but there were also slight changes to player and team ratings in those Dynamic Updates.

I think this would bring some added depth to NCAA Football. It'd be nice to use Michigan St. now, which is ranked No. 8. You'd probably see a little bump up in the team's ratings and individual ratings as well. Going off the default roster, Michigan St. isn't even ranked in the Top-25.

Is the reason this wasn't made a part of NCAA 11 is that there's just too many teams to update each week? Any chance we'll see this in the future?

[Sori]

Re: Dynamic updates ... too difficult?

Honestly, I think it has more to do with the great job the community does with roster updates. Why ruin a good thing?

Plus, any updates would reset the rosters back to unnamed rosters... could you imagine the backlash from fans after all the work that is put in each summer getting the rosters named? Nobody would even use the updates for that reason alone.

[seawolves9]

Re: Dynamic updates ... too difficult?

I think the dynamic updates would be great.. It'd really only effect online games though, seeing as how must people use the community rosters. But it'd still be really cool for them to update the rosters for online play.

[DJ]

Re: Dynamic updates ... too difficult?

Honestly, I think it has more to do with the great job the community does with roster updates. Why ruin a good thing?

Plus, any updates would reset the rosters back to unnamed rosters... could you imagine the backlash from fans after all the work that is put in each summer getting the rosters named? Nobody would even use the updates for that reason alone.

I got several updates in NCAA Basketball and my rosters never once went back to unnamed.