Technically yes, but in this instance what the competition would be doing is showing where a business was weak. By the competition doing something better it forces [the business] to either improve or risk losing consumers. Something Madden doesn't have to contend with. That they've lost consumers while having no competition is a strong indictment on the product (imo).
Well, we sort of do know. Let's argue the opposite. What if NBA Elite turned out to be a stellar title - would EA have cancelled it in the face of competition? Most of us would say no. And that would've either forced 2K to adjust their game if there was the appropriate consumer response to Elite, or they'd risk getting surpassed in areas where their competition was superior. Just think if Tiburon had exclusivity before 2005 where we'd be. I remember them saying online wasn't possible... until 2K did it. Or Ian Cummings saying true physics w/11 vs. 11 players on the field wasn't doable this gen... until NaturalMotion did it. Interactive sidelines, halftime shows, etc. I don't think for a second that if their was another NFL game out there doing these things, you wouldn't soon see them (or something better) in Madden. I give Tiburon props for what they did during the PS1 (and partially the PS2) era in terms of setting a foundation for videogame football. But this gen I can't think of a single innovation they've come up with. You can look at pretty much every other sports game this gen and point to various innovations they've come up with to push their genres forward - it hasn't happened with football.
I don't think lack of competition is the single greatest reason why Madden/NCAA are in the state they are; I'd say Tiburon itself is the number one reason. But lack of competition has contributed greatly to it
Comment