MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bk1369
    Rookie
    • Mar 2009
    • 80

    #16
    Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

    So Esposito is rated higher than Quintero? I guess that is because of his 3 career Major League ab's with 1 K! Give me a break. This reminds me of in past games where Nolan Ryan had a slider in his arsenal. Get a clue SCEA. Why do I bother spending money on this crap every year? At least give Knight an early copy of the game so he can get started doing ACCURATE rosters.

    Comment

    • authentic
      All Star
      • Jul 2009
      • 5812

      #17
      Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

      Originally posted by CubFan23
      this guy should do his homework, obviously not a Cub fan or much of a baseball fan.
      I'm not a Cubs fan because I didn't notice Lou Montanez at the bottom of the list who is a scrub? Get real guy
      Follow me on Twitch

      Comment

      • The Kid 24
        It's Show Time!
        • Jan 2007
        • 14765

        #18
        Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

        I CAN NOT believe they have the Brewers offense rated 21st overall... There is no way in hell the Brewers can be that... They no doubt have a top 5-7 offense... Looks like Ill be doing some editing!
        Milwaukee Brewers | Green Bay Packers | North Carolina Tar Heels | Wisconsin Badgers

        Comment

        • BDKiiing
          Best in the World
          • Jun 2008
          • 9334

          #19
          Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

          Originally posted by Prince of Milwaukee 28
          I CAN NOT believe they have the Brewers offense rated 21st overall... There is no way in hell the Brewers can be that... They no doubt have a top 5-7 offense... Looks like Ill be doing some editing!
          Likewise with the pitching...thats what Im most worried about...13th?! they are top 6 in the league
          St. Louis Cardinals | Milwaukee Bucks | Los Angeles Rams
          UWW | UWGB | Duke
          AEW

          Comment

          • The Kid 24
            It's Show Time!
            • Jan 2007
            • 14765

            #20
            Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

            Originally posted by bdolski
            Likewise with the pitching...thats what Im most worried about...13th?! they are top 6 in the league
            Well looks like I will have some major editing to do then... The Brewers are better then 15th overall. I would say there at least top 7-10 overall... Don't you agree?
            Milwaukee Brewers | Green Bay Packers | North Carolina Tar Heels | Wisconsin Badgers

            Comment

            • BDKiiing
              Best in the World
              • Jun 2008
              • 9334

              #21
              Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

              Originally posted by Prince of Milwaukee 28
              Well looks like I will have some major editing to do then... The Brewers are better then 15th overall. I would say there at least top 7-10 overall... Don't you agree?
              Most certainly...really only Yanks, BoSox, Philly, and San Fran are IRL better, and in the show Tampa, and the Cards (with Wainwright healthy) should be better...so I would say 7th would be more like it. And how is Wainwright considered better than Carps, when Adam is one of the best in the League?
              St. Louis Cardinals | Milwaukee Bucks | Los Angeles Rams
              UWW | UWGB | Duke
              AEW

              Comment

              • soxnut1018
                Puck Dynasty
                • Jan 2008
                • 626

                #22
                Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

                Originally posted by bdolski
                Most certainly...really only Yanks, BoSox, Philly, and San Fran are IRL better, and in the show Tampa, and the Cards (with Wainwright healthy) should be better...so I would say 7th would be more like it. And how is Wainwright considered better than Carps, when Adam is one of the best in the League?
                I don't think they are better than the Tigers and the White Sox, either.
                "Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you are a mile away from them and you have their shoes."

                Comment

                • JustinSainn
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 189

                  #23
                  Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

                  Originally posted by soxnut1018
                  I don't think they are better than the Tigers and the White Sox, either.
                  Everyone thinks their team is better than it actually is though. Human nature... I think the Cubs are better than they really are too I'm sure. That's why I never edit my own ratings because I know it'd be biased.

                  Comment

                  • BDKiiing
                    Best in the World
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 9334

                    #24
                    Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

                    Originally posted by soxnut1018
                    I don't think they are better than the Tigers and the White Sox, either.
                    I do not think you are correct.
                    St. Louis Cardinals | Milwaukee Bucks | Los Angeles Rams
                    UWW | UWGB | Duke
                    AEW

                    Comment

                    • catch212
                      Rookie
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 175

                      #25
                      Re: MLB 11 The Show 40-Man Roster Ratings: National League Central

                      Originally posted by soxnut1018
                      I don't think they are better than the Tigers and the White Sox, either.
                      Sox are better Tigers are not, imo.

                      Comment

                      Working...