Depth Vs. Starpower

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jibbles
    Banned
    • Mar 2011
    • 47

    #1

    Depth Vs. Starpower

    Hey all, I've been logging some serious hours on NHL 11 lately, and I have been playing around with different teams, modes, and of course my sliders.

    But what I wanted to talk about today and get everyone's opinion on is if you value depth over starpower or vice versa.

    What I mean by this is would you rather have 3 lines of players rated 75-85, or would you rather 1 line of 85+ with one superstar (90+) and the rest of your players 80 or under.

    For me personally, I have found that playing with a deep team is better for me, I like always being able to switch up my offensive scheme, and attack effectively with all my lines. I don't like to feel like any of my lines are "garbage" or a liability on the ice. I find it also helps to deal with fatigue and keeps your best players from getting injured because you are splitting ice time fairly evenly.

    So which do you prefer, depth or starpower?
  • bpete07
    Pro
    • Feb 2010
    • 542

    #2
    Re: Depth Vs. Starpower

    Originally posted by jibbles
    Hey all, I've been logging some serious hours on NHL 11 lately, and I have been playing around with different teams, modes, and of course my sliders.

    But what I wanted to talk about today and get everyone's opinion on is if you value depth over starpower or vice versa.

    What I mean by this is would you rather have 3 lines of players rated 75-85, or would you rather 1 line of 85+ with one superstar (90+) and the rest of your players 80 or under.

    For me personally, I have found that playing with a deep team is better for me, I like always being able to switch up my offensive scheme, and attack effectively with all my lines. I don't like to feel like any of my lines are "garbage" or a liability on the ice. I find it also helps to deal with fatigue and keeps your best players from getting injured because you are splitting ice time fairly evenly.

    So which do you prefer, depth or starpower?

    Depth so I can attack with all of my lines. I recently started playing with Boston in a Be a GM and they have good depth on all lines and I've started out 11-3 with balanced scoring from all lines.

    Comment

    • jibbles
      Banned
      • Mar 2011
      • 47

      #3
      Re: Depth Vs. Starpower

      ^ Nice, I play as boston as well and they have a very good set of forwards, in fact, I find that I have a surplus of talent and players like Marchand, Thornton, Paille, etc. have to rotate in and out. But I'm not complaining, I love it.

      I'm thinking if you play as pittsburgh, and trade away some picks and prospects and pick up some wingers, that is a team with depth and great talent as well.

      Comment

      • Vikes1
        Proctor, MN. Go Rails!
        • May 2008
        • 4102

        #4
        Re: Depth Vs. Starpower

        Originally posted by bpete07
        Depth so I can attack with all of my lines.
        I agree Bpete07.

        I'd rather have 3 to 4 solid lines...than just one Superstar line to depend on.
        1969 NFL Champions

        Comment

        • actionhank
          MVP
          • Jan 2010
          • 1530

          #5
          Re: Depth Vs. Starpower

          Depth for sure.
          That's one thing i do like about the Blues. They seem to be pretty solid when it comes to being able to have at least one guy with scoring on each line. (And thanks to the odd ratings, Cam Janseen is an 81, and scores goals pretty well...if only)

          Comment

          • D-MAC©®
            Pro
            • Sep 2005
            • 970

            #6
            Re: Depth Vs. Starpower

            Originally posted by jibbles
            I'm thinking if you play as pittsburgh, and trade away some picks and prospects and pick up some wingers, that is a team with depth and great talent as well.
            Why not try Vancouver instead, no need to make any trades.
            Nice mix of star players & has great depth IMO.
            I'm obviously a homer, but I find it really hard not to pick VAN.
            I'll do fantasy draft with VAN, if I need to mix it up/more challenging.
            I might try Boston, I try to trade for Lucic but his price is always too high.


            Originally posted by actionhank
            Depth for sure.
            That's one thing i do like about the Blues. They seem to be pretty solid when it comes to being able to have at least one guy with scoring on each line. (And thanks to the odd ratings, Cam Janseen is an 81, and scores goals pretty well...if only)
            Most of the "tough guys" are overrated this year!!!
            It's one of my biggest gripes, having to edit all of them.
            I have a list(pros/NHL only) if anyone is interested.
            I hated having Andrew Peters rated 77 & not making it on my team, & then find out he's playing on the 1st line on my AHL team.
            I like to get my prospects those minutes to make sure they progress.
            Last edited by D-MAC©®; 03-24-2011, 07:45 AM.
            Originally posted by Charles Barkley
            "My favorite city to visit in the world, Toronto..."
            "Jonas Val-Su-Eno-Wow-Sauce."
            aka: Jonas Valanciunas
            NHL: Vancouver Canucks
            NFL: Seattle Seahawks
            NBA: Chicago Bulls
            MLS: Vancouver Whitecaps

            Comment

            • xMrHighwaYx93
              Rookie
              • Apr 2010
              • 8

              #7
              Re: Depth Vs. Starpower

              I certainly prefer depth over star power as well. It just feels nice to know that you don't have any lines that are lacking in the skill department.
              NHL: Carolina Hurricanes
              MLB: Washington Nationals
              NFL: Dallas Cowboys

              Music. <3

              Comment

              Working...