Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Seanzie
    Rookie
    • May 2006
    • 181

    #1

    Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

    So I'm a realism buff. For my first season in dynasty, I plan on keeping every conference the way it is. However, in my second season, I do plan on moving TCU to the Big East, and Fresno State, Hawai'i and Nevada into the Mountain West.

    However, knowing that college football is never static in terms of conference movement, I was also planning on making some changes a little deeper into dynasty mode. For example, I put a lot of thought into what could happen in say, 2018.

    I'm going to make Texas an independent. They'll have their own TV network, and I figure they're one school who could do it successfully.

    To get the Big 12 back up to 12 teams (after Texas' departure), I was going to add former SWC members SMU, Houston, and Arkansas.

    I'll replace Arkansas with Clemson in the SEC, and replace Clemson with West Virginia in the ACC.

    In the Big East, I'm going to add UCF and Memphis, and strip the conference of its AQ status.

    Other minor ones:

    C-USA
    Add Temple (from MAC)

    Sun Belt
    Add Tulane (from C-USA)

    WAC
    Add North Texas (from Sun Belt)
    Add Western Kentucky (from Sun Belt)

    Any other cool ideas?
  • Redacted01
    Hall Of Fame
    • Aug 2007
    • 10316

    #2
    Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

    Originally posted by Seanzie
    Add Western Kentucky (from Sun Belt)
    Thank god Hawai'i is gone.

    Comment

    • RebelHog
      MVP
      • Jun 2009
      • 1022

      #3
      Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

      Originally posted by Seanzie
      So I'm a realism buff. For my first season in dynasty, I plan on keeping every conference the way it is. However, in my second season, I do plan on moving TCU to the Big East, and Fresno State, Hawai'i and Nevada into the Mountain West.

      However, knowing that college football is never static in terms of conference movement, I was also planning on making some changes a little deeper into dynasty mode. For example, I put a lot of thought into what could happen in say, 2018.

      I'm going to make Texas an independent. They'll have their own TV network, and I figure they're one school who could do it successfully.

      To get the Big 12 back up to 12 teams (after Texas' departure), I was going to add former SWC members SMU, Houston, and Arkansas.

      I'll replace Arkansas with Clemson in the SEC, and replace Clemson with West Virginia in the ACC.

      In the Big East, I'm going to add UCF and Memphis, and strip the conference of its AQ status.

      Other minor ones:

      C-USA
      Add Temple (from MAC)

      Sun Belt
      Add Tulane (from C-USA)

      WAC
      Add North Texas (from Sun Belt)
      Add Western Kentucky (from Sun Belt)

      Any other cool ideas?
      Realistically speaking, Arkansas is NEVER leaving the SEC.

      Comment

      • Dr Death
        Air Raid
        • May 2009
        • 1632

        #4
        Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

        Originally posted by dochalladay32
        Thank god Hawai'i is gone.
        Not a Warrior fan???
        Dr Death
        Air Raid

        Comment

        • blkrptnt819
          MVP
          • Feb 2011
          • 2055

          #5
          Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

          Originally posted by RebelHog
          Realistically speaking, Arkansas is NEVER leaving the SEC.
          That's not far fetched. I think they thought about it this time around.
          CFB: Ohio State, FSU
          CBB: DUKIE BLUE DEVILS!!!!!!!
          NBA: Cleveland Cavaliers

          If you can't tell I LOVE DUKE!!!!!!!!

          Comment

          • Wildcats302
            MVP
            • May 2011
            • 1046

            #6
            Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

            Originally posted by blkrptnt819
            That's not far fetched. I think they thought about it this time around.
            I don't think they really did. Maybe for a second and then realized how stupid a move it would be to go to a conference that is blatantly showing favoritism to Texas and kissing their butt.

            Comment

            • RebelHog
              MVP
              • Jun 2009
              • 1022

              #7
              Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

              Originally posted by blkrptnt819
              That's not far fetched. I think they thought about it this time around.
              Never even came up, we are not leaving the best conference in collegiate sports. To be screwed by Texas again. No way.

              Comment

              • volstopfan14
                MVP
                • Jul 2010
                • 2307

                #8
                Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                Has anyone put together a confrence religinment in which Texas,Texas Tech, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State are in the Pac-16? I'm trying to put it together just to see what it would look like but I can't find one that works.
                Tennessee Volunteers
                Charlotte Hornets

                Comment

                • Wildcats302
                  MVP
                  • May 2011
                  • 1046

                  #9
                  Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                  Originally posted by volstopfan14
                  Has anyone put together a confrence religinment in which Texas,Texas Tech, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State are in the Pac-16? I'm trying to put it together just to see what it would look like but I can't find one that works.
                  I'd say one division would have:

                  OK State, TX, TX Tech, OK ST, Arizona, Arizona State, Utah and Colorado. East Division.

                  The other:

                  USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, Oregon ST, Washington and Washington State. West Division.

                  You can't change the name of the conference though, so it will stay the Pac 12, which is silly to me, but just look at the Big XII(-2) and the Big Ten(+2) lol it does happen in real life.

                  Comment

                  • TDenverFan
                    MVP
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 3457

                    #10
                    Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                    It's tough to gage conference realignments in 2018... Eastern Michigan or any non-AQ could easily become the next Boise St/TCU/USF
                    Football: Denver Broncos
                    Baseball: Lehigh Valley Iron Pigs
                    Hockey: Allentown Phantoms
                    NCAA: The College of William and Mary Tribe


                    William and Mary Class of 2018!

                    Comment

                    • volstopfan14
                      MVP
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 2307

                      #11
                      Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                      Originally posted by Wildcats302
                      I'd say one division would have:

                      OK State, TX, TX Tech, OK ST, Arizona, Arizona State, Utah and Colorado. East Division.

                      The other:

                      USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, Oregon ST, Washington and Washington State. West Division.

                      You can't change the name of the conference though, so it will stay the Pac 12, which is silly to me, but just look at the Big XII(-2) and the Big Ten(+2) lol it does happen in real life.
                      I guess I didn't explain it well. I'm not really concerned with divisions right now. I'm trying to figure out where to make other confrence changes. If the Pac-16 happened, then the B1G TEN and the SEC would likely want to expand to 16 too. What teams should I give them? What should I do with the Big 12? In a dream scenario, I would send the Big 12 teams to the MWC or the Big East and delete the Big 12 but you can't do that.
                      Tennessee Volunteers
                      Charlotte Hornets

                      Comment

                      • Redacted01
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 10316

                        #12
                        Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                        Originally posted by Dr Death
                        Not a Warrior fan???
                        No, I'm fine with Hawai'i, but would you really want to be WKU or Hawai'i and have to play eachother in the middle of the season? One insane road trip.

                        Comment

                        • Wildcats302
                          MVP
                          • May 2011
                          • 1046

                          #13
                          Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                          Originally posted by volstopfan14
                          I guess I didn't explain it well. I'm not really concerned with divisions right now. I'm trying to figure out where to make other confrence changes. If the Pac-16 happened, then the B1G TEN and the SEC would likely want to expand to 16 too. What teams should I give them? What should I do with the Big 12? In a dream scenario, I would send the Big 12 teams to the MWC or the Big East and delete the Big 12 but you can't do that.
                          OK, well I'll just throw out some suggestions for you.

                          Big Ten: Maybe add, Notre Dame, Missouri(gives Nebraska an old rival from the Big XII), Pittsburgh(Gives Penn State an instate rival), and then maybe throw a bone to West Virginia as your 16th team. Or maybe diss Missouri and add VA Tech to go along with W. Virginia.

                          SEC: I'd raid the ACC. Give me FSU, Miami, Clemson and GA Tech. Those make the most sense to me although if you wanna throw in VA Tech in place of one of the four I suggested I'd get that.

                          The Big XII would have 5-6 remaining teams depending on whether or not you sent Missouri to the Big Ten or SEC(if you wanted). So, you could send the rest to the Big East to give it 12 teams or some to the Mountain West, some to Big East, some to ACC...there are a lot of fun ways you can do it. Or you can keep them in the Big XII(what's left of it) and try to raid C-USA teams like Houston, Tulsa, Rice, SMU, etc, to fill it back up.

                          It's your custom conference so make it how you prefer and as you can see you can do it a lot of fun ways.

                          Comment

                          • fcboiler87
                            Pro
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 592

                            #14
                            Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                            Did we get confirmation that we'd be able to make these type of changes mid dynasty?

                            Comment

                            • MrRudy
                              Pro
                              • Jul 2010
                              • 622

                              #15
                              Re: Realistic Future Conference Re-Alignments?

                              Originally posted by fcboiler87
                              Did we get confirmation that we'd be able to make these type of changes mid dynasty?
                              Yes sir! It's in and I for one, am giddy

                              Comment

                              Working...