NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

**bucknutz18** · 06-08-2011, 10:57 PM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

1. Mich D a B+ is the biggest joke of all
2. Oregon is not a 6* prestige....1 Rose Bowl win ever and 1 BCS win ever back in 02...
3. UCLA 2* and Tenn 4* are jokes....prestige needs to be based off of more than the last 3 years ea...jesus...speaking of jesus ND has legit beef being dropped as well...and oh yea OSU obvi shouldt have an A+ offense anymore =(

**The JareBear** · 06-08-2011, 11:02 PM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

So Penn State should be dropped but ND shouldn't?

Doesn't make sense to me, honestly

Not saying the ratings are right, just saying I am looking for consistency in the arguments...

Prestige rating affects recruiting ability as well as in-seasons and offseason player progression. Just because a school was great 20 years ago doesn't mean they should still have a leg up on schools that are doing better than they are the past 4-5 years. They still recruit but I think a lot of their classes are overhyped considering the results.

**noplace** · 06-08-2011, 11:11 PM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Originally posted by SeaOfRed75

Exactly. That and Miami grads.

And will freaking EA give Bo and the Blackshirts credit and rate them a damn A some year please? A likely All-American at each level with other returning talent and a damn B+ again. Penn St and Miami's D better than Nebraska's?

cosign 100%

**GoBlue10** · 06-08-2011, 11:15 PM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

The 2 biggest jokes on that list is Michigan as a B+ on defense and also Michigan droping to a 5* prestiege.

I expect Michigan's D to improve but after the past 2 seasons I don't see how anyone can justify a B+ rating. I would rate them a C or C+ at the absolute max. Plus Michigan can have 10 losing seasons and would still be one of the most prestiegious teams in America.

**huskersbears** · 06-08-2011, 11:17 PM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

They really need to allow users to edit prestige ratings if they want to, and they could also use some sort of mass ratings changes, where you can take a team's 95 rating on offense and quickly lower it to a certain rating by automatically making small deductions from every offensive player.

**STLcardz-NDirish** · 06-08-2011, 11:17 PM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Originally posted by jaredlib

So Penn State should be dropped but ND shouldn't?

Doesn't make sense to me, honestly

Not saying the ratings are right, just saying I am looking for consistency in the arguments...

Prestige rating affects recruiting ability as well as in-seasons and offseason player progression. Just because a school was great 20 years ago doesn't mean they should still have a leg up on schools that are doing better than they are the past 4-5 years. They still recruit but I think a lot of their classes are overhyped considering the results.

What about penn state? I never said one thing about them. consistency? what??
anyways... I know ND hasn't won a lot of ball games recently, I'm all for that and i see your point from that prospective. But, I dont see how you knock a school down a prestige when they are 1:as of now getting better, 2: have the largest fan base in the nation, 3: continue to roll in top recruiting classes, 4: have the most national tittles & hisemen winners, 5: have thier own TV network and 6: have tons and tons of tradition.
I am in no way trying to brag about past accomplishments but I'm just saying, those should be taken into account.
As i stated, if the prestige ratings are based on Ws and Ls, then why did ND go down if they won more then they did the year before?
That my friend, is what doesn't make sense to me, Honestly

**The JareBear** · 06-08-2011, 11:33 PM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

I apologize, earlier it had been said a couple times that PSU should be down to five stars.

The truth of the matter is, all you have to do is have one good season and you will be back to 6* again.

**buckeye02** · 06-09-2011, 12:06 AM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Originally posted by STLcardz-NDirish

No 6* is for prestigious programs. I know ND hasnt been able to get it done on the field consistently, but they have the most tradition and continue to recruit well. I mean they were a 6* last year and finished with a better record this year so their prestige goes down? dont see the logic

I agree with you.

**cparrish** · 06-09-2011, 12:12 AM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w

ontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> Colorado a 2* prestige? Ouch... Hawkins has to go down as one of the worst BCS coaches in history. I understand Colorado has been pretty bad the past five years, but bad enough to erase the past history and make them a 2* prestige school? Even Colorado State who has been atrocious is rated higher, that's bad.

**buckeye02** · 06-09-2011, 12:16 AM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Originally posted by cparrish

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w

ontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> Colorado a 2* prestige? Ouch... Hawkins has to go down as one of the worst BCS coaches in history. I understand Colorado has been pretty bad the past five years, but bad enough to erase the past history and make them a 2* prestige school? Even Colorado State who has been atrocious is rated higher, that's bad.

Ive used Colorado in a few of my dynasties. The black on black and that stadium are pretty awesome. At least being a 2 star you have a challenge ahead of you.

**LionsFanNJ** · 06-09-2011, 12:17 AM

Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUU- great Rutgers a 3* this year. Expected but makes it more of a challenge to build them up as the big east power.

**The JareBear** · 06-09-2011, 12:19 AM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Originally posted by Block-O

I agree with you.

So explain to me when a team should finally lose a prestige star. 20 years no BCS bowl win? 30 years? Correct me if I am wrong but isn't Dame losing to Navy lately? This has to be reflected somehow right?

**cparrish** · 06-09-2011, 12:19 AM

Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Originally posted by Block-O

Ive used Colorado in a few of my dynasties. The black on black and that stadium are pretty awesome. At least being a 2 star you have a challenge ahead of you.

No kidding huh? I always kinda thought they were more of a 3* program now, as opposed to the late 80s and 90s when they were a 5* and 4* program. I guess I see things differently than EA, but then again, we only have our good friend Dan Hawkins to thank for this.

**cparrish** · 06-09-2011, 12:20 AM

Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

Originally posted by LionsFanNJ

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUU- great Rutgers a 3* this year. Expected but makes it more of a challenge to build them up as the big east power.

As they should be. There is nothing wrong with a 3* program and face it, Rutgers is at best a 3* program.

**acreyman** · 06-09-2011, 12:22 AM

Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

Probably the biggest Boise fan in here, we lost a LOT of GREAT players this year and I think the team is over rated in the game, even with Kellen Moore returning. Our WR core is just no where near as good as last year, and our D lost some huge talent. Its gonna be a rough year.

NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment