LSU's off and def ratings should be reversed imo.
NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
LSU's off and def ratings should be reversed imo.LSU Tigers
New Orleans Saints
New Orleans Hornets???
Chicago White Sox -
If that's true, ND should've dropped a star about 4 years ago.Last year it was explained to me simply:
To go from five-stars to six stars you have to finish in the top 5 or make it to the BCS title game. To lose a star, go from six star to five star, you have to finish out of the top 15.
That was the explanation given to how the game decides these things. Why Texas didn't drop, I don't know, that's EA's prerogativeComment
-
Well, they only play Div. 1 schools. SEC teams start the season with 2 games against East Wyoming State. By opponent's win %, Notre Dame played the toughest schedule in the nation in 2010. They also played Stanford, who I believe finished #4 in the nation. Florida is playing Furman the 2nd-to-last game of the season....FURMAN!They play maybe one or two nationally ranked teams a year than fill their schedule with mid level talent at best.
USC and Mich/MSU (either or) will typically be their ranked opponents, than after facing middle level talent they fill their last 4 games with cupcakes (sometimes backfires)
Their schedule isn't on par with a Big Ten(12)/SEC schedule. Only AQ conference they could be scheduling better than is the Big East, than again that's not difficult.Last edited by NDFan1029; 06-10-2011, 02:20 AM.Comment
-
Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige
Wait a minute, Michigan an A-? BahahahhaahhahhahahahahComment
-
Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige
SMU is 70th. Not sure about that.MLB: Texas Rangers
Soccer: FC Dallas, Fleetwood Town
NCAA: SMU, UTA
NFL: Dallas Cowboys
NHL: Dallas Stars
NBA: Dallas Mavericks
I own a band check it outComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
Best thing I've heard all thread. I realy think you hit the nail on the head b/c prestige and tradtion or different. To me prestige fluctuates and is more about recent win and losses which will greatly effect recruiting. But Tradition is more static so a school can still lose and still get good ball players b/c of strong tradition.What EA needs to do is create a "tradition" rating which would be seperate from the prestige star rating therefore teams that have great tradition such as the "michigans, notre dames,miami's" that have struggled in the past years would not be rated as high in current prestige however there tradition rating would remain among the best....IMO of course...Don't mind me I'm just lurkingComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
Best thing I've heard all thread. I realy think you hit the nail on the head b/c prestige and tradtion or different. To me prestige fluctuates and is more about recent win and losses which will greatly effect recruiting. But Tradition is more static so a school can still lose and still get good ball players b/c of strong tradition.
You can use tradition in a pitch. I am fine with the stars. Teams like ND are still up there because they are still respected and can bring in some serious star power for the field. Michigan can still do the same. They have be dipping just a little but there is no doubt that it will turn around in the very near future.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1tRd...layer_embedded
"If you don’t love it, leave it. USA, No. 1." -Ricky StanziComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
But again they respected and get good recruits b/c of strong tradtion even though they have been having sub-par seasons lately. Recruits will say yea i know they have been losing but its still ND or Michigan. And that's b/c of a winning tradtion. I'm just saying tradtion should play a bigger role than just a pitch in the game. B/c IRL it does matter alot.You can use tradition in a pitch. I am fine with the stars. Teams like ND are still up there because they are still respected and can bring in some serious star power for the field. Michigan can still do the same. They have be dipping just a little but there is no doubt that it will turn around in the very near future.Don't mind me I'm just lurkingComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
Yea I get what you are saying but that is why ND and Michigan are still 5* teams in the game, so they still get the respect and bring in some top notch guys.But again they respected and get good recruits b/c of strong tradtion even though they have been having sub-par seasons lately. Recruits will say yea i know they have been losing but its still ND or Michigan. And that's b/c of a winning tradtion. I'm just saying tradtion should play a bigger role than just a pitch in the game. B/c IRL it does matter alot.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1tRd...layer_embedded
"If you don’t love it, leave it. USA, No. 1." -Ricky StanziComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
They should take away a star from Penn State and give it to KU. We're 3 years removed from a 12-1 season and an Orange Bowl win. One bad season under a new coach with the players learning a new system and the coach bringing in the highest rated recruiting class in school history this year does not deserve a drop to 2*s in my mind.
I love the game and think EA is doing some great things but one area they consistently lack in is properly evaluating the players, programs, and universities. I mean heck, they constantly come on here asking us for info about our favorite schools. I mean don't get me wrong, I love that they're trying to get some community input, but don't you think with the millions they make off of us every year (for generally just buying an "upgrade" rather than a new game) that they could afford to hire some people to do some research and get proper analysis in order to have an accurate representation of the players, schools, and programs?
Just my 2 cents...Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
LOL so true. Sometimes I see things on the game that make me wonder if any actual research was done or did they just watch a highlight vid and read an article on ESPN and go from there."Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."
OS Blog
The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
They do have both Program Prestige and Program Tradition in the game. You see it when you are recruiting players. What you want is for Program Tradition to have a separate star system from the Prestige Star system? I had figured both "Program Prestige" and "Program Tradition" as seperate variables were what made up the Prestige Star system final tally. Some programs drop faster then others and that is likely due to that program tradition score as it is the one that changes less frequently where as the program prestige score is based more upon the record a team has been having.Best thing I've heard all thread. I realy think you hit the nail on the head b/c prestige and tradtion or different. To me prestige fluctuates and is more about recent win and losses which will greatly effect recruiting. But Tradition is more static so a school can still lose and still get good ball players b/c of strong tradition.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)
Imo 2*'s is a fairly accurate refelection of the state of KU football, in fact one could argue that KU should never have been granted 3* status in the first place (the Jayhawks have been playing fb since 1890; in all that time they have posted back to back bowl seasons just once).They should take away a star from Penn State and give it to KU. We're 3 years removed from a 12-1 season and an Orange Bowl win. One bad season under a new coach with the players learning a new system and the coach bringing in the highest rated recruiting class in school history this year does not deserve a drop to 2*s in my mind.
As for your "one bad season" argument, 2010 wasn't just a bad season-it was catastrophic:
3-9 (1-7 in conf)
Lost 3-6 to FBS school North Dakota State at home;
1-7 in conference play last season (all seven losses by double digits, 5 of them by 28+).Comment

Not up to date then. Why can't we edit this stuff?
Comment