Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hampshire2012
    Rookie
    • Jul 2010
    • 358

    #1

    Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

    The ability to search for recruits based on how many points off the lead you are.

    Is there anyone else out there who would find this hugely useful?
  • Tolstoy
    Rookie
    • Feb 2011
    • 48

    #2
    Re: Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

    Originally posted by hampshire2012
    The ability to search for recruits based on how many points off the lead you are.

    Is there anyone else out there who would find this hugely useful?
    Man, that would save soooo much time.
    Pondering the perfect Text-Sim.

    Comment

    • blkrptnt819
      MVP
      • Feb 2011
      • 2055

      #3
      Re: Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

      I wish we could search by attributes. Like highest to lowest Block Shedding or Power Move etc.
      CFB: Ohio State, FSU
      CBB: DUKIE BLUE DEVILS!!!!!!!
      NBA: Cleveland Cavaliers

      If you can't tell I LOVE DUKE!!!!!!!!

      Comment

      • moylan1234
        MVP
        • Jul 2004
        • 3946

        #4
        Re: Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

        Wouldn't searching by interest basically achieve the same thing?

        Comment

        • GGGswim
          Rookie
          • Oct 2010
          • 329

          #5
          Re: Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

          Originally posted by moylan
          Wouldn't searching by interest basically achieve the same thing?
          If I'm not mistaken, when you run that search there is a possibility you'll get recruits that have you listed 7th, in the red (for a guy already down to his Top-3) but only 540 behind, as well as recruits that have you listed 3rd, and -1020 points. But hey, you're only two spots b/h the top school!

          Kidding aside, there are definitely holes in the search function. Another is when you run a search and see that there are guys on the list w/o the little green dot, but they're between two green-dotted interested guys...whom you're more than 700 pts back. Which means you're not in the middle guy's top-10 but you're between 700 and whatever pts b/h the leader. A useless "find".

          Would love to be able to search on category heading's, but that gets tricky with the ATH guys. For example, Press coverage -- for my CB recruits, the No. 1 characteristic I sort on with the PocketScout printout -- isn't shown in the ATH on-screen breakdown. I'm not sure both 'throwing' measures are shown for an ATH either.
          Now, if the CPU already KNEW those, though, but simply wasn't displaying them, we may be talking about having something.

          Guess that means I came to the party w/o a solution idea...

          Comment

          • demon19000
            Rookie
            • Jul 2010
            • 195

            #6
            Re: Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

            Yeah I agree. In my opinion; the more categories you can sort recruits by, the better.
            BA BA BA BA
            THE BILLS MAKE ME WANNA SHO
            UT
            !
            --------------------------------------
            PSN: demon19000

            Comment

            • Lop_Huckawuckie
              Rookie
              • Jul 2008
              • 13

              #7
              Re: Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

              Would definitely be nice to sort and prioritize recruits based on a combination of attributes, like say 'acceleration and catching' or 'weight and power move' etc..

              Comment

              • kirkangil
                Pro
                • May 2003
                • 985

                #8
                Re: Does anyone else wish NCAA had/gets this?

                I hate when i search and it comes up with results and it still has guys who have signed with another team clogging the list.

                Waste of time.

                Comment

                Working...