[Playmakers]

Quote: Originally Posted by AuburnAlumni

Nope. Constructive criticism is fine. But "Why doesn't EA Care?" "I'm completely disgusted at the lack of awesome grass" "This is the same old game" That stuff makes me want to bash my head against a wall. Especially when it's repeated ad nauseum by every 5 post wonder who pops their head in this forum to whine and moan for a few weeks, then vanish back into oblivion until the following June when the vicious cycle starts all over. I think clear improvements such as CPU RB AI, etc. should be recognized. There are obvious issues, such as excessive pancakes on Heisman and a lack of QB scramble, but overall I think it is an excellent demo.

CPU RB AI was easy to fix in NCAA 11.....i just think they (EA) were too lazy to do it themselves and waited a year to do it.

So i woudln't really praise them for doing something that only required proper ratings to improve

I do agree though some people are making complaints as if the DEMO is the final product.....there's a reason why they call it a DEMO to test play a earlier build of the game that most likley isn't what you'll get at release

I'm not defending the game and saying it'll be perfect at release there will still be issues as with all of EA's football games. I just wish they would one year put all the pieces together or come close to it....which is why i don't think their CPU RB AI is a big deal because that was one of the easiest things to fix in NCAA 11 by the consumer himself and yet they (EA) didn't bother to do it until a year later