View Single Post
Old 07-17-2011, 09:22 AM   #9
mjhyankees
MVP
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Dec 2007
Re: Making the awareness rating more meaningful

Quote:
Originally Posted by crenk
I havent bought madden since 08', self imposed ban until I felt they upgraded franchise. Im thinking this might be the year I jump back in. the individual traits could be really cool if they work as advertised. That got me thinking, bear with me.....

I was watching an old episode of hard Knocks and saw just how badly these rookies were doing in training camp. Lineman missing blocks, corners lining up wrong, receivers running the wrong route etc. My question is could this translate into Madden.

I know we already have a dose of missed blocking assignments in madden but this is as far as I know not related to awr rating, correct?
Would it infuriate people if your computer controlled receivers with low awr occasionally ran the wrong route? RB's missing a blocking assignment, linebacker dropping back when they were supposed to blitz. If done with the appropriate frequency I think it would really help differentiate rookies (or any player with low awr) from vets or guys with high overall awr..
What do you think....would it piss people off or be welcomed?
I agree...I wouldn't want it to be overdone but that awr should affect you . I remember on old gen with the QB vision cone low awr for a QB meant a narrow cone (and lots of trying to manually move it) and harder to complete passes. High awr was a big cone and lots of completions....it should matter. I have a rookie back in chise whose rating is a 72. His truck, speed, agility, etc are all in the high 90's. His awr was real low leading to the 72 ovr. But I use him and led the league in rushing 3 out of his 4 years (he missed 6 games one year). His awr just didn't seem to matter.
__________________
"I'd rather lose to the cpu with realistic stats than win with ridiculous stats."

If interested these are my Madden 12 sliders: http://www.operationsports.com/forum...dden-12-a.html
mjhyankees is offline  
Reply With Quote