NCAA Football 12 Roster Glitch Confirmed, Patch to Address Concerns

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • skins5680
    Rookie
    • Aug 2004
    • 1

    #1

    NCAA Football 12 Roster Glitch Confirmed, Patch to Address Concerns


    Christian McLeod has confirmed the NCAA Football 12 roster glitch will be addressed in an upcoming patch. The fix for now? Are you ready for this? Delete your named roster file.

    What are the problems you ask? Here are just a few comments from the OS community.

    One of the NCAA Football 12 Software Engineer's posted this topic (roster related), in hopes to get some things resolved.

    via skins5680
    When you edit the name of a scrambling QB it changes them to balanced and editing a balanced QB changes them to scrambling. I noticed when i downloaded a roster with names that Denard Robinson was shown as a balanced QB so i went back to the default roster and he was back to a scrambler. So i played a game with the named roster and he attempted zero scrambles. I then played a game with the default roster and he scrambled five times in the first two drives.

    via Gotmadskillzson
    I seen this last week when I downloaded Fairdale Kings rosters for the 360. It just isn't the QBs tendancy that changes, it is also the pass rusher, coverage guys, hard hitters.

    Everybody tendancy description changes......

    I noticed it also effected the Kick off and punt returns for the CPU. And effected the punt blocking the user. With no names, I was able to return punts back for a TD sometimes with a good enough returner.

    With names, the gunners get down the field super fast like they did in NCAA 11.

    With out names, the CPU was able to return punts and kick offs back for TDs on me. With names, their blocking is non existent and the cpu have a hard time making it to the 30 yard line on kick offs and on Punt returns they get 3 yards now, my gunners get down the field so fast now I be right on top of them as soon as they catch the ball.

    So as it stands, no names seem to give the better game play.

    Being that other players tendancies have changed, I noticed some things.

    1. LBs get a lot of tips and INTs on named rosters, even when they aren't in position to do so.

    2. Safeties who suppose to be heavy hitters, turn into coverage guys and Intercept passes they normally wouldn't.

    3. WRs get off the line quicker on named rosters and they hit stick tackle people on Ints. I had intercepted a pass and a WR hit sticked me.

    4. Thomas with his new found strength is now more likely to keep the ball on read option plays. More like 90% of the time now. This was the same way in NCAA 11 when you made a QB's strength too high.

    5. DEs don't generate a pass rush on named rosters like they do on non named rosters.

    Now I am REALLY glad I didn't delete the default roster. I will have that to play until they fixed the name rosters issue.

    Way too many players to edit get them back to what they suppose to be tendancy wise. Which is another thing, with the work around even though they back to their correct tendancy, their ratings will be out of whack.

    Good players will be made weaker, weaker bad players will be made stronger.

    via buckeye02
    Same issue with no patch.

    Also messed around, it changes the tendency for every single player. Im thinking that the rosters will have to be named again if this is patched.

    How can they patch it to go in reverse and correct tendencies on already named rosters?

    Looks like a more realistic patch is a fix to keep it from changing for future named rosters.

    via Bumble14
    Just received confirmation that this issue is being looked into heavily by the guys at EA. Be patient--there is a sizable amount of testing with different design divisions to identify the issue and look into a possible fix.

    It would be helpful if you can please put together a chart showing the following for all positions affected by this issue. I would then like to provide this information to EA. This would also help with making community edits if necessary. Thanks.

    Position:
    Default Tendency:
    New Tendency:
    Result:

    via BaylorBearBryant
    Well, so far...

    Position: Quarterback
    Default Tendency: Scrambler
    New Tendency: Balanced
    Result: Default scrambling quarterbacks hardly scramble at all.

    Position: Quarterback
    Default Tendency: Balanced
    New Tendency: Scrambler
    Result: Default balanced quarterbacks scramble all the time.

    Position: Running back
    Default Tendency: Speed
    New Tendency: Balanced
    Result: Default speed backs act as balanced backs. They'll attempt power moves too often.

    Position: Running back
    Default Tendency: Balanced
    New Tendency: Speed
    Result: Default balanced backs act as speed backs. They'll never attempt power moves.

    If you want to read more about the ongoing NCAA Football 12 roster glitch, simply read the replies to this topic.
  • patsfan1993
    Pro
    • Jul 2008
    • 948

    #2
    Re: Possible roster glitch

    Did you check to see what roster edits were made? My guess is he was edited to be a balanced qb to better fit in Hoke's new offense.

    Comment

    • Gotmadskillzson
      Live your life
      • Apr 2008
      • 23441

      #3
      Re: Possible roster glitch

      I seen this last week when I downloaded Fairdale Kings rosters for the 360. It just isn't the QBs tendancy that changes, it is also the pass rusher, coverage guys, hard hitters.

      Everybody tendancy description changes......

      Comment

      • Gotmadskillzson
        Live your life
        • Apr 2008
        • 23441

        #4
        Re: Possible roster glitch

        Originally posted by patsfan1993
        Did you check to see what roster edits were made? My guess is he was edited to be a balanced qb to better fit in Hoke's new offense.
        NO

        On default rosters he is listed as scrambler. And Fairdale King didn't edit anybody ratings and it still changed his player style description. I even took a picture of it and put it in the bugs thread last week.

        Comment

        • patsfan1993
          Pro
          • Jul 2008
          • 948

          #5
          Re: Possible roster glitch

          Really? That's weird.

          Comment

          • northface28
            Pro
            • Jul 2009
            • 762

            #6
            Re: Possible roster glitch

            Are you serious? This is out of control.

            Comment

            • Gotmadskillzson
              Live your life
              • Apr 2008
              • 23441

              #7
              Re: Possible roster glitch

              Very serious......

              Play against the cpu with default rosters, then play against them with named rosters. Game play is different.

              Comment

              • Redacted01
                Hall Of Fame
                • Aug 2007
                • 10316

                #8
                Re: Possible roster glitch

                Yea, Denard Robinson is balanced on buckeye and gator's. Don't know if they touched his ratings, but his acc. is a 99 so he's got the abilities of a scrambler still it seems. If you go to edit player, it even marks tendency as a scrambler. But when you leave, it says balanced. Pretty sure he's still going to run. Something else to test I guess.

                Comment

                • Gotmadskillzson
                  Live your life
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 23441

                  #9
                  Re: Possible roster glitch

                  He doesn't run nearly as much as he did with the default non named rosters. He isn't the only one, all the scramblers are that way with named rosters and the balanced QB don't run at all.

                  Some thing is wrong with NCAA 12 database tables. Stuff shouldn't be effected just because you named the players. But it definitely seemed to have effect the game play AI.

                  Comment

                  • northface28
                    Pro
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 762

                    #10
                    Re: Possible roster glitch

                    Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
                    He doesn't run nearly as much as he did with the default non named rosters. He isn't the only one, all the scramblers are that way with named rosters and the balanced QB don't run at all.

                    Some thing is wrong with NCAA 12 database tables. Stuff shouldn't be effected just because you named the players. But it definitely seemed to have effect the game play AI.
                    Here I am itching to get off work and I play and I see this. This saps any desire to play now, I could always play without names, but this "either/or" gamestyle is very disheartening.

                    Comment

                    • ezio
                      MVP
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 2853

                      #11
                      Re: Possible roster glitch

                      I looked at Gator's and Gaming tailgates and he was balanced on both. Even though as others said if you look at the tendency it says scambler. I guess I may be plaiyng without names. I wonder what else it affects?

                      Comment

                      • Gotmadskillzson
                        Live your life
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 23441

                        #12
                        Re: Possible roster glitch

                        Originally posted by ezio
                        I looked at Gator's and Gaming tailgates and he was balanced on both. Even though as others said if you look at the tendency it says scambler. I guess I may be plaiyng without names. I wonder what else it affects?
                        I noticed it also effected the Kick off and punt returns for the CPU. And effected the punt blocking the user. With no names, I was able to return punts back for a TD sometimes with a good enough returner.

                        With names, the gunners get down the field super fast like they did in NCAA 11.

                        With out names, the CPU was able to return punts and kick offs back for TDs on me. With names, their blocking is non existent and the cpu have a hard time making it to the 30 yard line on kick offs and on Punt returns they get 3 yards now, my gunners get down the field so fast now I be right on top of them as soon as they catch the ball.

                        So as it stands, no names seem to give the better game play.

                        Comment

                        • northface28
                          Pro
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 762

                          #13
                          Re: Possible roster glitch

                          Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
                          I noticed it also effected the Kick off and punt returns for the CPU. And effected the punt blocking the user. With no names, I was able to return punts back for a TD sometimes with a good enough returner.

                          With names, the gunners get down the field super fast like they did in NCAA 11.

                          With out names, the CPU was able to return punts and kick offs back for TDs on me. With names, their blocking is non existent and the cpu have a hard time making it to the 30 yard line on kick offs and on Punt returns they get 3 yards now, my gunners get down the field so fast now I be right on top of them as soon as they catch the ball.

                          So as it stands, no names seem to give the better game play.
                          God, I hate to say it, but that constitutes a broken game. Man, this is incredibly disappointing.

                          Comment

                          • BA2929
                            The Designated Hitter
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 3342

                            #14
                            Re: Possible roster glitch

                            Originally posted by northface28
                            God, I hate to say it, but that constitutes a broken game. Man, this is incredibly disappointing.
                            Whoa, whoa, whoa...calm down. I'm not seeing as big of a difference as others. I still see QBs scramble, I still see the CPU returning kicks deep down-field. I'm using named rosters from the OS community. Just because a handful of people are seeing something doesn't mean the game is broken.

                            Just last night a CPU QB from Missouri ran for 80 yards against me on scrambles.
                            "Baseball is the coolest sport because, at any moment, the catcher can stop the game and go tell the pitcher a secret" - Rob Fee

                            Comment

                            • Gotmadskillzson
                              Live your life
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 23441

                              #15
                              Re: Possible roster glitch

                              That's like saying just because your console didn't freeze, then there is only a handful of consoles froze with the game. Which is far from the case since there is an EA engineer on this board now just for that problem alone. So it ismore then just a handful of people.

                              Is the game broken ? No

                              Is there a big difference between how the cpu AI plays with named rosters and non named rosters ? YES

                              I mean the OP wasn't the 1st person to bring this up. This been brought up on various websites for the past week now. It is an issue.

                              Game killer ? No

                              But it is an issue.

                              Comment

                              Working...