[Strings74]

Quote: Originally Posted by Buckstopshere

For me there's no question that there are some features still missing from the current games that they had back then and I think that's inexcusable regardless of pretty graphics and production values. A lot of people still refer to 06 with fondness and I'm one of them. That thing practically was a light RPG in terms of the depth of features it had. The OP's video and such proves my own suspicions to a point where my response is like someone else said: An angry chuckle of sorts.

Sure. All I was really trying to say in the first place is that some of the presentational similarities are pretty startling given how 2002 is a ten year old game.

Obviously the current games look a ton better and are more challenging to play.

But NCAA 2002 is a lot more similar to NCAA 12 than say, Super Tecmo Bowl was to NCAA 2002, for example. Despite the fact that there were roughly 10 years between each example. (Yes, I know different developers etc.)

1991 = Super Tecmo

2001 = NCAA 2002

2011 = NCAA 12

1991:



2001:



2011: