Madden NFL 12 Player Ratings - Top 5 Quarterbacks -
Operation Sports Forums
If you're having problems logging in or staying logged in, please clear/delete your cookies/cache.
We are monitoring and fixing issues in this thread.
Thanks for your patience.
The upgrade is complete, but you've probably noticed the forums are only showing posts up to about April 8. Posts made after that are still in the process of being moved over, and that should take another week or two. Feel free to start a new thread.
The site might feel a little slow while work continues. Engineers are staying on it through the night to get things moving faster again. Thanks for your patience.
It would be nice for the ratings to reflect some perspective. For example, Manning is no longer at his best, I'd say he's playing around a 94 this far into his career. Rodgers is probably also around a 94 with a higher ceiling. Brady should be somewhere around a 97 because while he had a phenomenal season last year, he's not 2007 Brady which clearly was him at 99. I'd see the rankings something more like this:
This so called Guru Ratings specialist must have been paid a little extra to blow up these guys stats. If I were in charge of these ratings you would see players who actually have flaws in their games, and some realistic value. When will we have a game that proves players are human. These stats are the equivalent to the first time you ever created a player, and made yourself 99 at everything.
I've said this once, and I'll say it again. The 99 rating should be used sparingly. Designated for the best of the best, cream of the crop! No one in the past 10 years should have been given the 99 rating. Maybe a 98 for Brady in his 16-0 run a couple years back!
It would be nice for the ratings to reflect some perspective. For example, Manning is no longer at his best, I'd say he's playing around a 94 this far into his career. Rodgers is probably also around a 94 with a higher ceiling. Brady should be somewhere around a 97 because while he had a phenomenal season last year, he's not 2007 Brady which clearly was him at 99. I'd see the rankings something more like this:
I suppose overalls don't matter as long as their individual ratings are spot on.
I think if you bumped Rodgers up to a 95/96 those would be very fair ratings. Manning is coming off a rocky season by his standards and Rodgers just carried the Packers to a Super Bowl victory.
They should scrap overall ratings completely. Would do a lot of good and would allow players to be rated on their own merit instead of trying to make them a certain overall.
It would be nice for the ratings to reflect some perspective. For example, Manning is no longer at his best, I'd say he's playing around a 94 this far into his career. Rodgers is probably also around a 94 with a higher ceiling. Brady should be somewhere around a 97 because while he had a phenomenal season last year, he's not 2007 Brady which clearly was him at 99. I'd see the rankings something more like this:
I suppose overalls don't matter as long as their individual ratings are spot on.
Agreed. Some more perspective could be put into the ratings. But, as another poster said, I think they rather give high ratings to more people so fans of those teams don't feel cheated
@Chuckles012 lol yeah he not top 10 material in real life but in the game u gonna have Santonio Homles, Braylon Edwards, and Plaxico Burress to throw to and you telling me they wont make a QB look good so Madden not gonna make him a top ten QB? In my book Sam Bradford way better and a few others.
They should scrap overall ratings completely. Would do a lot of good and would allow players to be rated on their own merit instead of trying to make them a certain overall.
Tweet
Comment