[SIMstyle]

Quote: Originally Posted by cgalligan

@simstyle - yeah, now that I look at the other teams ratings, Hillis being 87 isn't too bad. Mendenhall is a 90spd, and I'm sure he is faster than Hillis. I do tend to look at things with Orange Tinted glasses when talking about my Browns. But, I do think that they have some promising young players, like McCoy, Haden, Ward, which is why I think the McCoy rating might be higher than some were anticipating.

no harm in to bro, we ALL do it. when me and my friends starting doing ratings it took a long time to be objective. and while i wouldn't rate Hillis an 87 (one solid year and we rate consistency pretty high) i'd probably rate Cribbs a 62 at max. he's never had more than 23 catches in a year and i think devin hester proved that great athlete doesnt = great receiver.

keep in mind that we rate first year 1,000 yard receivers in the 76 range. so even a player like jeremy maclin (still hasnt broke 1,000 yet) is like a 75.

props for repping your Browns tho. a part of me cant wait until my Pats aren't elite anymore so i can go back to the days of people underestimating us and thinking we're easy wins online. i loved that.

carnalnirvana you're basically on the same page with us ratings wise, you ever thought about rating players?