[menglish20]

Quote: Originally Posted by JHolsinger

To me this is an extremely generous rating for the 7 time career starter. The most ridiculous aspect is how he compares to some of the more proven quarterbacks, with better 2010 and career stats. I am by no means a nit pick when it comes to ratings, but this is awful imo. Kevin Kolb (84) 2010 Stats 115/189 1,197 YD 7 TD 7 INT Kyle Orton (82) 2010 Stats 293/498 3,653 YD 20 TD 9 INT David Garrard (83) 2010 Stats 236/366 2,734 YD 23 TD 15 INT Is his 84 rating really based purely on hype?

Stats aren't everything, but I think Garrard > Orton/Kolb.

Orton's nothing special who benefited from his system. Garrard's slightly above average. Kolb's largely unknown, with some upside left, and he brings a little mobility.

That said, I think Kolb should be right around 80 if his individual ratings are rated correctly. Overall is stupid. And ratings shouldn't be based on stats/production. Base it on the actual skills of the players.