That's a terribly lame argument. Why then, can EA Sports produce a much more detailed and engrossing experience for their FIFA and NHL games? How has 2k made such an immersive and complete NBA experience? How come SEGA has been able to make a quality MLB game as well?
Why is it that while playing FIFA, NHL, NBA2k, or The Show, I feel immersed, as though I'm really there, on the field/rink/court. And with Madden, I feel as though I'm playing a mediocre video game? Is it because Madden is just a video game? Or is it because Madden is mediocre?
Agreed. It's interesting to see the trend in game reviews. In year's past it was as though reviewers copy-pasted their prior year's review, just as Madden would copy-past their prior year's game. The critics would echo the same old problems that have been inherent for years, while touting the new hyped-up features, and ultimately giving the game a "B+".
It seems that reviewers (even here at OS), have finally become more objective when critiquing Madden.
But it begs the question, why has it taken so long? Why did OS give past iterations of Madden exceptional scores? For example, Operation Sports gave Madden 10 a 9/10. Where was the objectivity then? Seriously, what's changed?

Comment