NCAA Football 12 Review

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Texas Hum
    Banned
    • Feb 2011
    • 2

    #91
    A big gripe about an otherwise fine game is the ridiculous number of soaring one handed interceptions. Seriously, you see a couple plays like that a year and they happen every single game. I still see LINEBACKERS jumping 50 inch verticals to deflect or snag balls. Who puts that crap in the game because it ruins the realism.

    Comment

    • sublime55
      Rookie
      • Jul 2011
      • 106

      #92
      what i hate is that the quarter back is seemingly unable to throw a bullet pass over the middle without a line backer or d linemen deflecting the pass. its super frustrating. EA really needs to fix the pass trajectory in this game.

      Comment

      • markarendt
        Rookie
        • Sep 2011
        • 4

        #93
        NCAA12

        I need help when i try to use the the coach cam (R2 and joystick) to view my players and the play that they will be running i can not see my wide receivers on passing play. i have a ps3 if u know what i am doing wrong please help.

        Comment

        • markarendt
          Rookie
          • Sep 2011
          • 4

          #94
          I need help when i try to use the the coach cam (R2 and joystick) to view my players and the play that they will be running i can not see my wide receivers on passing play. i have a ps3 if u know what i am doing wrong please help.

          Comment

          • southernbelle
            *n th* Fl*w*rs
            • Jul 2002
            • 1098

            #95
            does everyone still think this is a "great" game?

            Comment

            • Nakeja71
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 136

              #96
              "A polished, tight playing, extremely deep and highly customizable NCAA Football experience has finally been released to the masses. Yes, the game absolutely has some rough edges, but the positives far outweigh the negatives. Fans of the series rejoice, this is the NCAA Football game we’ve wanted for years, and most importantly, the NCAA Football game we deserve."

              Someone got paid for making statements like this. I am sorry that is the so bogus.
              Last edited by Nakeja71; 09-12-2011, 09:04 PM. Reason: not done

              Comment

              • Earl1963
                MVP
                • Aug 2003
                • 1985

                #97
                Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                I'm yet to really get into this game, just got it 3 days ago. So far its seems pretty good, just lacks the fun factor of the PS2 days, but so far it's aiight.
                Megatron

                Comment

                • thdudeabides
                  Rookie
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 368

                  #98
                  Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                  Originally posted by Nakeja71
                  "A polished, tight playing, extremely deep and highly customizable NCAA Football experience has finally been released to the masses. Yes, the game absolutely has some rough edges, but the positives far outweigh the negatives. Fans of the series rejoice, this is the NCAA Football game we’ve wanted for years, and most importantly, the NCAA Football game we deserve."

                  Someone got paid for making statements like this. I am sorry that is the so bogus.
                  I'm sure no one was paid to give a positive review, but I will say, remember this next year. How much credibility are you going to give an OS reviewer?

                  Comment

                  • Herky
                    Working for the weekend
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 4715

                    #99
                    Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                    I've stopped reading and listening to reviews. Nobody ever has the game long enough to actually get into real problems. This review was in July and it took weeks after the game was released for the community to find issues.

                    Reviews for sports games are pretty incomplete IMO. It's not the reviewer's fault, they just don't have the time to dive deep into franchises and dynasty's. Game-play wise it still takes time to see if results happen over and over.
                    GT: Herkyalert
                    PSN: Herkyalert

                    Iowa Hawkeyes
                    Northern Iowa Panthers
                    Minnesota Vikings
                    Chicago Cubs
                    Minnesota Twins
                    Boston Celtics
                    Minnesota Timberwolves

                    Comment

                    • BoSoxPujols
                      MVP
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 1262

                      #100
                      Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                      Originally posted by Herky
                      I've stopped reading and listening to reviews. Nobody ever has the game long enough to actually get into real problems.
                      Not to mention every reviewer and website is in the pockets of EA in one way or another. There are virtually no unbiased reviews from the main websites...including OS.

                      Reviews are a joke and mean nothing.

                      Comment

                      • novadolla
                        Pro
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 551

                        #101
                        Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                        I am really starting to hate this game, the custom playbook issue, the one handed INTs by average LBs, good accuracy QBs throwing the ball 30 yards out of bounds on wide open out routes. WRs dropping almost every single pass thrown to them, and balls hitting the WRs in the head.

                        Makes me just want to start doing what every one else is doing run the ball every down from the maryland I or other power formations.

                        I played a game against the number 1 guy on PS3 and the score was 70-50 all he would do is throw the ball up to Alshon and my DBs would just stand there and watch him rocket catch the football. Seems like EA promotes non-sim football.

                        Also get rid of the stupid game planning feature, everything should be based off ratings.

                        Comment

                        • edscott
                          Rookie
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 58

                          #102
                          Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                          Originally posted by novadolla
                          I am really starting to hate this game, the custom playbook issue, the one handed INTs by average LBs, good accuracy QBs throwing the ball 30 yards out of bounds on wide open out routes. WRs dropping almost every single pass thrown to them, and balls hitting the WRs in the head.

                          Makes me just want to start doing what every one else is doing run the ball every down from the maryland I or other power formations.

                          I played a game against the number 1 guy on PS3 and the score was 70-50 all he would do is throw the ball up to Alshon and my DBs would just stand there and watch him rocket catch the football. Seems like EA promotes non-sim football.

                          Also get rid of the stupid game planning feature, everything should be based off ratings.

                          The gameplan/strategy feature, I agree, is totally ill conceived. If it was based on penalties (i.e., aggressive big hits would mean more late hits or roughing the passer, aggressive picks/catch would be more pass interference, aggressive strips would mean more facemask and horsecollars, etc), then I think it would be much more realistic, and we might actually get some diverse penalties. As it stands now, there is pretty much no disadvantage to playing aggressive on big hits or strip ball. I don't know why EA doesn't do this.

                          Comment

                          • novadolla
                            Pro
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 551

                            #103
                            Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                            Originally posted by edscott
                            The gameplan/strategy feature, I agree, is totally ill conceived. If it was based on penalties (i.e., aggressive big hits would mean more late hits or roughing the passer, aggressive picks/catch would be more pass interference, aggressive strips would mean more facemask and horsecollars, etc), then I think it would be much more realistic, and we might actually get some diverse penalties. As it stands now, there is pretty much no disadvantage to playing aggressive on big hits or strip ball. I don't know why EA doesn't do this.
                            Completely agree

                            Comment

                            • Austin97
                              Rookie
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 6

                              #104
                              Originally posted by Klocker
                              BINGO!
                              I have to agree with you. I've played ncaa for so long that I(like you) had to re-learn quite a few new controls. It helps that madden uses some of the same controls so it makes it easier to learn.

                              Comment

                              • SuperNoVa27
                                Pro
                                • Apr 2009
                                • 898

                                #105
                                Re: NCAA Football 12 Review

                                You are a sick bastard for bumping this, I swore it read "NCAA Football 13 Review"

                                Comment

                                Working...