Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515a using Tapatalk
Willis or Beason?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Re: Willis or Beason?
Lol CatMan. I don't watch either player so I don't know. It seems Willis is a more traditional linebacker in size and extraordinary with his athletic ability at his position. The Panthers utilize a faster linebackers to play zone, which is why Beason and Thomas Davis work in their system. I guess it depends on how you play defense, but I think Willis would be successful no matter what.Comment
-
-
Re: Willis or Beason?
You can't go wrong with either. Willis is better athletically and rushing the passer/getting off blocks. Beason excels in coverage and reading plays. I've used both and I find Beason to have a slightly bigger impact against the All-Madden bs. Asumming you don't control him I find he gets in position and is able to make plays and read the offense well. Beason also has the ability to progresses to 99 after the first season if he has a good year.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Willis or Beason?
I'd say beason is better than willis, but urlacher is better than both. Just about as athletic as both and has WAY BETTER zone and man coverage....
If you're running a 3-4 I'd go BEASTon and urlacher, if you're running a 4-3, I'd go willis(because he's a 90 speed and would have to cover more ground) though urlacher would be my personal choice no matter what as I am a bears fan....Comment

Comment