NCAA Football 13: Five Toughest Dynasties

[drtrix]

Re: NCAA Football 13: Five Toughest Dynasties

I have been playing as New Mexico. Coming off three straight 1-11 seasons the first season was a tough one with Texas and TT on the non-conference slate and tough conference games with SDSU, Boise and a surprisingly good Nevada team.

Recruiting is difficult as they have no strong pitches other than PT or playing style.

[The GIGGAS]

I'm glad I picked UMass in the OSS dynasty...

[Joobieo]

Agree 100%. The Academic Prestige in this game is mind boggling.

I did not know that the SEC was full of prestigious universities while the service academies where the equivalent of a community college.

Books aren't what bring in the money, sports are .

[buickbeast]

I'm rolling with Army in my offline. Their a blast to play with. Sweet uniforms, open schedule, nice stadium, great rivalries =)

[Bmore Irish]

im using UMass in a 1-star online dynasty, should be interesting

[Andrews85]

Re: NCAA Football 13: Five Toughest Dynasties

I would swap out Oregon St. with Eastern Michigan. EMU has to recruit against 4 other FBS schools in state and not to mention the other BIG10 schools in the Midwest. Definitely a fun dynasty.

[Blue]

Re: NCAA Football 13: Five Toughest Dynasties

I think UTSA should get some love on this list. Their team is terrible outside of their scrambling QB, I think the RB is around a 62 overall if I remember correctly. Their pitches aren't good at all either.

True but they only have about 5 seniors so it's easier to recruit the first year.

[gerg1234]

Re: NCAA Football 13: Five Toughest Dynasties

Books aren't what bring in the money, sports are .

Hard to tell if you're being sarcastic...

Look at research grant money (research) schools get in a year and compare that to the peanuts football brings in.

[orion523]

Re: NCAA Football 13: Five Toughest Dynasties

Surprisingly, UCLA looks as if it may be a difficult go this time around so I've chosen them. They have just one pipeline state(Cal), they must compete with USC who play in the same city, they're rated just two stars, and are introducing new offensive(Pro) and defensive(3-4) systems(not by default, but IRL Mora has changed to a Pro/3-4 setup so that's what I did). Should be fun!

[bodank82]

UMass has a few transfers eventually added to later op rosters. It has been the funniest franchise I've done. Living in MA and happy to have a public institution represent our state is a plus.

[HadlerT]

I think that UMass is the hardest team to play a dynasty with.

[Joobieo]

Hard to tell if you're being sarcastic...

Look at research grant money (research) schools get in a year and compare that to the peanuts football brings in.

Oh no I was just kidding . Lol.

College is founded on education after all .

[bmxnw]

Pfft. Recruiting is EASY. I was the OC at UMass for two years in my OD and had a top 30 recruiting class each year.

[kmt789]

True but they only have about 5 seniors so it's easier to recruit the first year.

The second year is a mess though and you lose your best player (only 80 overall you have) after the first year

[SkillzKillz719]

Sad, but true to see my Beavs on the list.

The play on the field is almost just as frustrating. Literally every 5 wide open interceptions do you get 1. The CB Poyer will lock-down the best receiver but after that it's a crap shoot. There is ZERO protection up front, and Agnew is slower than you'd want.

Along with no intangible pitches, it's a tough dynasty.


And the more and more I play with them in NCAA 13, the more and more I get nervous for this year.
I'm very worried.