NHL 13 Ratings - Eastern Conference Player and Team Ratings
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
University of Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey
Minnesota's Pride on Ice: 1974, 1976, 1979, 2002 & 2003 NCAA National Champions
"The name on the front of the jersey is a hell of a lot more important than the one on the back."
-Herb Brooks -
Re: NHL 13 Ratings - Eastern Conference Player and Team Ratings
I think Pavelec is better than Winnipeg/Atlanta has made him look. He shows flashes of greatness. Unfortunately, Winnipeg's defense is great on offense but is lacking in their own end.LOL....He wouldn't even make it through warmups!
But, as for Broduer....It's a good debate but would you rather have Broduer or Pavelec at a 82? I guess thats where I'm coming from....I'll probably bump Pavelec down to a 79 or 80.....I'm so sick of him getting great ratings the past several years and he continues to do nothing!NHL REVAMPED ROSTERS - CO-CREATORComment
-
Re: NHL 13 Ratings - Eastern Conference Player and Team Ratings
Exactly, Winnipeg has made him a 24-25 year old workhorse. He stole games for Winnipeg on multiple occasions and behind a semi-solid defense would probably put up awesome numbers.http://dropthepuck.blogspot.com/
Up to date Prospect Profiles, NHL Rumors, News, Debates and Discussion!
(NEW: Oliver Ekman-Larsson Prospect Profile!)Comment
-
Re: NHL 13 Ratings - Eastern Conference Player and Team Ratings
Hey everyone,
Last year I had begun a roster editing project that involved quite a few members of our fine community here. I was not planning on doing so this year, but after seeing the ratings that they have released..... It will be done. So please check out the post that I posted in the Roster thread, and please consider offering assistance in some way shape or form.
Thanks!NHLREVAMPED - CO-CREATORREVAMPEDROSTERS-
NHL14 - http://goo.gl/rtEVLy
NHL13 - http://goo.gl/Gmb9sf
CYCLONIAC'S MUSIC PACK - http://goo.gl/oPQtZtComment
-
Re: NHL 13 Ratings - Eastern Conference Player and Team Ratings
I just posted this in the Western Ratings thread but figured it was just as necessary here. It does a good job of explaining how they rated players and why they did it the way they did. A lot of guys are saying "so-and-so had more points than this guy last year and therefore should be rated higher." So hopefully this will at least put some of that to rest.
Comment

Comment