Recommended Videos

Collapse

NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rule of Two
    Banned
    • Aug 2011
    • 182

    #61
    Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

    Originally posted by chandlerbang
    kid please i been watching longer than you most likely been alive
    If that's the case then you'd already know Granger is a good on-ball defender. Just because LeBron and Wade played some God-like basketball against Indiana doesn't make it any less true.

    Comment

    • icemanfrost
      Rookie
      • Jul 2009
      • 62

      #62
      Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

      Well i know one thing if nash gets a bump up 87
      Duncan and Garnett better get one as well
      Gamertag: IceManFrost
      PSN: JoeFrost

      Comment

      • sa1nts
        Rookie
        • Feb 2012
        • 56

        #63
        Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

        wow, Nash 87, Kobe 93, i think Howard will be around 90-95 and Pau around 85
        Lakers in 2k13 will be nearly impossible to beat, like Heat were in 2k12, but better
        Sorry for my bad English

        Comment

        • icemanfrost
          Rookie
          • Jul 2009
          • 62

          #64
          Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

          Originally posted by J_Posse
          Being along time Spurs fan and knowing how Tony's game doesn't translate well to 2K, then I think a 85 or 86 would be perfect for Tony. Timmy and Manu are on the decline (obviously), but still play well in limited minutes and deserve solid ratings (82-85).

          From Spurs Nation/Bills Backer Clubhouse
          From a long time spurs fan myself i dont think their type of ball has ever translated well in 2k.
          VC just haven't gotten the spurs system yet but expecting a bump up in overall from duncan, leonarx and green and a minor bump for splitter
          Last edited by icemanfrost; 09-09-2012, 04:16 AM. Reason: spelling
          Gamertag: IceManFrost
          PSN: JoeFrost

          Comment

          • Itsfuntobethespurs
            Rookie
            • Jun 2012
            • 84

            #65
            Originally posted by icemanfrost
            From a long time spurs fan myself i dont think their type of ball has ever translated well in 2k.
            VC just haven't gotten the spurs system yet but expecting a bump up in overall from duncan, leonarx and green and a minor bump for splitter
            I'm guessing 85 for Tony, 87 for Manu and 86 for Timmy (he had a star by his name in the kinect video)
            "When nothing seems to help, I go and look at a stonecutter hammering away at his rock perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack showing in it. Yet at the hundred and first blow it will split in two, and I know it was not that blow that did it, but all that had gone before." - Jacob Riis

            Comment

            • Wad3County12
              Rookie
              • Sep 2012
              • 7

              #66
              There's no way Steve Nas Is better then Tony Parker right now.

              Comment

              • lv2bll
                Pro
                • Mar 2009
                • 662

                #67
                Originally posted by Wad3County12
                There's no way Steve Nas Is better then Tony Parker right now.
                That's debatable, as a pure point yes, shooter yes. Consistency yes. Defensively no (albeit Tony isn't that great either) and finisher no. Who would i rather have on my team? Nash. With him you wouldn't need to run plays.

                Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
                Live, Love, Learn
                and Play Basketball
                I live in a word where I give respect to get it back.
                I'm not owed anything by anyone.

                Comment

                • Streaky McFloorburn
                  Rookie
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 279

                  #68
                  Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

                  Originally posted by KB2009Champ
                  What attributes do ya'll think faried will have?

                  Posterior, highlight film, acrobat, alley-ooper, and hustle points ?
                  I hope Charles Barkley will have this skill
                  "The power of accurate observation is often called cynicism, by those who don't have it." - George Bernard Shaw

                  Comment

                  • Kaanyr Vhok
                    MVP
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 2248

                    #69
                    Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings #NBA2K13 ratings: Steve Nash 87, Danny Granger 84, Kenneth Far

                    Originally posted by 2k10Fonzarelli
                    Nash got a bit of a bump didn't he?

                    84 > 87

                    Has the formula changed at all? I don't think I've heard anything about that
                    Same formula as always. Laker =1-5 point ratings boost

                    Comment

                    • iLLosophy
                      Plata o Plomo
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 3673

                      #70
                      Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

                      Originally posted by lv2bll
                      That's debatable, as a pure point yes, shooter yes. Consistency yes. Defensively no (albeit Tony isn't that great either) and finisher no. Who would i rather have on my team? Nash. With him you wouldn't need to run plays.

                      Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
                      I'd say defense is even debatable. When pop would rather use Danny Green to guard point guards, TP's defense is pretty much suspect. The only thing TP has over Nash is speed & quickness.

                      Comment

                      • FLAWDAxBALLA954
                        Rookie
                        • Sep 2012
                        • 110

                        #71
                        Originally posted by NowAndLaterCARZ
                        seriously? pick pocket? how could you possibly talk down on people about that "stupid fictional game" when you yourself know nothing about basketball. whats next, u gonna say rondo getting spot up shooter is debatable? smh. and of course you're a heat fan, these new heat fans make me sick. its a few true loyal heat fans i know that were fans since tim hardaway, mashburn and zo, and they have basketball knowledge. n yea im a gotdam wizards/bullets fan! been one since michael adams, tom gugliatta and k.duckworth (my fav squad was c.webb, juwan, strickland, calbert chaney, chris witney, n muresan). but anyways those ratings are pretty accurate, especially manimal.
                        Why everytime somebody makes a ridiculous statement you guys use it as an excuse to throw dirt on heat fans? We just can't get a break. (sigh)

                        Comment

                        • sO100
                          Rookie
                          • Mar 2012
                          • 13

                          #72
                          I don't think most of you even watch basketball. Those saying Kobe's rating is too high and his defense shouldn't be that high should leave and go to a golf post or something.

                          Comment

                          • Kaanyr Vhok
                            MVP
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 2248

                            #73
                            Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

                            Originally posted by iLLosophy
                            I'd say defense is even debatable. When pop would rather use Danny Green to guard point guards, TP's defense is pretty much suspect. The only thing TP has over Nash is speed & quickness.
                            TP is a much better finisher too.

                            Comment

                            • sO100
                              Rookie
                              • Mar 2012
                              • 13

                              #74
                              Originally posted by RedSceptile
                              Don't care about Nash overall just hope both his and Kobe's defensive attributes aren't grossly overrated.
                              Second year all defense for the first time since 05 lol what do you want his defense to be sir?

                              Comment

                              • Thunder Storm
                                Rookie
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 480

                                #75
                                Re: NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

                                Originally posted by icemanfrost
                                Well i know one thing if nash gets a bump up 87
                                Duncan and Garnett better get one as well
                                This statement doesn't make sense. The attributes are valued differently for bigs and guards, so an 87 for A 39 year old Nash will translate differently for a 37 year old KG or Duncan.

                                This is why releasing overall ratings is bad.
                                2K teams : Rockets,Thunder
                                222-34 online

                                Comment

                                Working...