02-07-2013, 02:42 AM
|
#1
|
|
Rookie
|
'13/'14 Rosters for NCAA '13 (XBox - WIP)
Things we used for this roster file
- BuffEye's NCAA '13 Dynasty Rosters Base (Oct. Release)
- Xanathol's Roster Editor
- 24/7 Composite Rankings
- cfbstats.com
Gamertag: UGA Lovell32 / Call Me LSU
(ALL TEAMS DONE ✓)
Added Teambuilder Teams in spoiler tab
FAQ (Click Spoiler Tab)
Spoiler
Code:
How did you rate recruits?
This is the chart we used (24/7 Composite rankings)
5 Stars (#1) - 83
5 Stars (#2-#17) - 82
5 Stars (#18-#34) - 81
4 Stars (Higher end 98/97) (#35-#51) - 80
4 Stars (Lower End 97) (#52-#66) - 79
4 Stars (96) (#67-#82) - 78
4 Stars (95) (#83-#102) - 77
4 Stars (94/93) (#103-#155) - 76
4 Stars (92/91) (#156-#226) - 75
4 Stars (90) (#227-#277) - 74
4 Stars (89) (#278-#330) - 73
3 Stars (88) (#331-#374) - 72
3 Stars (87) (#375-#479) - 71
3 Stars (86) (#480-#627) - 70
3 Stars (85) (#628-#797) - 69
3 Stars (84) (#798-#962) - 68
3 Stars (83) (#963-#1141) - 67
3 Stars (82) (#1142-#1368) - 66
3 Stars (81) (#1369-#1573) - 65
What about JUCOs?
#1: 82
#2: 81
#3-#5: 80
#6-#10: 79
#11-#14: 78
#15-#18: 77
#19-#27: 76
#28-#36: 75
#37-#46: 74
#47-#59: 73
#60-#72: 72
#73-#86: 71
#87-#100: 70
How did you come up with that Top 25?
Using ESPN's early top 25 predictions, which can be found here
May I ask two questions about the chart? Are the rankings you use by position or are you using a national ranking that includes all players at all positions? Did you come up with the OVR ranges in the chart by studying the recruits generated in dynasty mode?
Its mostly just national ranking, but on some positions (QB) for example I will grade a little differently sometime. The OVR will comes close with the generated recruits on dynasty, only difference with mine is you wont see many diamonds in the rough. I'll post a pic of a dynasty I uploaded in the editor where it shows the overalls of the recruits...The highest recruits are 85/84 and most the time those guys are kickers and punters. Doing these the last couple of years I have looked backed at previous yrs game to see where certain guys have came in at.
For the incoming freshman on this roster, I do not agree with using a table matching ranking to OVR. Each player should be rated individually rather than on a scale. An overall is nothing but a badly done average of individual ratings. If you want any help rating some of these incoming freshman, I'd be happy to help. This is a great project and I look forward to playing with this roster.
I agree that the table will have its flaws, but at the same time numbers that have been posted of 40 times and other stats are just as flawed. I've tried this before somewhat and believe me it just creates fights over this guy is better then him and so on...Remember this is basically trying to predict the future with guys who have not played a down yet, there will be some boom and bust no doubt but I cant predict that.
The recruits are too low/too high...
Simming couple seasons using the method I've done this yr and past yrs is kind of a happy medium, if you rank them too high - then come their SR season you will be seeing ALOT of high 90s, do them too low and you are gonna see alot of players cut when the next set of recruits come in.
Do you improve the others players during the offseason?
Yep, about all the players have 2 pt upgrade to their overall but there are some cases where we might say well this guy was too high to begin with. Also will give additional pts for guys on All American list (I use Phil Steele's) as well as checking stats on cfbstats.com
Guys are too slow...
Still tinkering around things with speed, I do think the game plays better at a slower speed but, I also did it for dynasty purposes as progression from yr to yr they will gain more speed. Still if you feel a guy is too low, just post it and we will check it out...
Can these be transferred over to the PS3?
No, they cannot.
Last edited by Team UGA; 06-25-2013 at 05:34 PM.
|
|
|