Well, since everyone complains about people bding under, or overrated, should the system taken out?
If so, what would replace them?
If so, what would replace them?
-
"Sports is human life in microcosm."
Add(Ps3): xWastedYouth
-
Re: Overall Ratings
It shouldn't be totally removed but it would be cool if we had an option to turn it off, then in association mode we would have a use scouting to really get the identity of a player instead of automatically knowing they're caliber. -
Re: Overall Ratings
No they shouldn't remove them. They should get some well known NBA statician or blogger like Zach Lowe or Henry Abbot to alter their current formulas so that unathletic white guys who can shoot aren't underrated (like Dirk, Bonner, Novak). The PF position doesn't put enough value on 3s.Originally posted by Dogslax41Comment
-
Re: Overall Ratings
Overall rating system? As in, "Hey! this player is a 75 and he should be a 78!" ? It means absolutely nothing to me. If it was removed, I wouldn't care.Comment
-
Re: Overall Ratings
The Overall rating should be more reflective of what is going on currently in the NBA, instead of being a "life-time" achievement score.
It also should not be used as the base value judgement by the AI, because it often leads to misleading inferior decisions, especially when considering rotations and substitutions.
If any stat should be "hidden" from the end-user, it is the current OVR.
Oh, and because MJ stated he would chose Bryant over James, we all know Kobe should have a higher OVR rating then Lebron...
Comment
Comment