NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 15 Players

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The JareBear
    Be Good To One Another
    • Jul 2010
    • 11560

    #16
    Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

    Not shocked at all by these ratings. We had a thread predicting this stuff not too long ago
    "Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."

    OS Blog

    The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.

    Comment

    • The_Wise_One
      Why Not Us?
      • Jan 2011
      • 2633

      #17
      Not bad. Nice to see only one elite player. Mosley seems a tad too high, maybe a 95 would be better
      SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
      MISSOURI TIGERS
      CHELSEA FC

      Comment

      • boxboy99
        MVP
        • Feb 2006
        • 2320

        #18
        Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

        As a Buckeye fan, I say Miller's QBA is too high, but 84 is pretty average on the game. I'm rolling with Clemson in my Online Dynasty, so very exciting to run with Boyd and Watkins.
        MLB the Show - Cubs
        2015: 80-82
        2016: 96-66 - Lost Game 7 of WS (18 innings to Red Sox)
        2017: 93-69 - Swept by Red Sox in World Series
        2018: 100-62 - Swept by Dodgers in NLCS
        2019: 14-11

        Comment

        • GetReal
          Banned
          • Apr 2013
          • 122

          #19
          Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

          How did Braxton Miller even break 90

          Comment

          • Gotmadskillzson
            Live your life
            • Apr 2008
            • 23442

            #20
            Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

            They all too damn high......But then again they are always too high every year.

            Comment

            • JerseySuave4
              Banned
              • Mar 2006
              • 5152

              #21
              Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

              don't know what you guys are talking about, these guys in the game aren't based off of real players.

              Comment

              • TripleCrown9
                Keep the Faith
                • May 2010
                • 23715

                #22
                Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

                Originally posted by JerseySuave4
                don't know what you guys are talking about, these guys in the game aren't based off of real players.
                Well then the guy that wrote the article shouldn't have addressed all 15 players by name lol.
                Boston Red Sox
                1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
                9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

                Comment

                • Gap Integrity
                  Pro
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 853

                  #23
                  Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

                  Originally posted by freernnur5
                  Everything looks good to me except this one point when discussing Braxton Miller:

                  "Miller is a very good passer (91 Throw Power, 84 Throw Accuracy)"

                  He is an excellent runner as a QB, but not that good as a passer. He finished tied for 43rd in the country in passer rating at 140.5 (McCarron was #1 at 175.3). His YPA of 8.0 is tied for 25th with 9 other QBs. His completion percentage of 58.3% was good for 80th in the country.

                  Do those stats really show someone who is a very good passer to you?

                  I know I am a Michigan fan so this may sound like the homer in me talking. He is a very good QB because of his legs and that opens throwing opportunities for him, but to say he is a very good passer is a little laughable.

                  Just compare that year of his to Denard Robinson's from 2011 (2012 he was injured for 5 games and was not a QB so the stats aren't a fair comparison).

                  2011 - 55.0%, 8.4 YPA, 139.7 passer rating.

                  Keep in mind Denard had 15 ints that year to sink his passer rating as opposed to the 6 Miller had in 2012. Everyone, including myself would admit Denard Robinson is not a very good passer. He was electric because of his legs first and foremost.
                  I totally agree with you as a Buckeye fan. It looks like EA boosted his Passing attributes tremendously. He is a phenom running and scrambling, but he is certainly not anywhere near an elite passer, which a 96 OVR suggests. I don't care how much time he spent with George Whitfield, until he proves he has improved on the field, I'd say EA overrated him. You can't always look at the OVR rating, but in this case they had to have pumped his arm up to achieve that mark. My only recommendation to people who don't like it is Download the Buffeye roster when we drop it.
                  "Statistics always remind me of a fellow who drowned in a river where the average depth was three feet." -Woody Hayes

                  Comment

                  • theharbinater
                    Rookie
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 188

                    #24
                    Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

                    Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
                    They all too damn high......But then again they are always too high every year.
                    agreed. i wish ncaa and madden would be cooperative in their ratings.

                    a 99 should be best in the world, all-timer type player, and should never happen in college.

                    i dont think there should be a cap on college players, but very rarely should any of them be in the 90's, and the elite should usually be in the mid-high 80's where most good-not-great pro's are. maybe a handful each year. those that would play and impact from day 1 in nfl, like clowney, julio/aj green a few years back, cam newton, luck/rg3, etc.

                    most players should be in 60's/70's, with the good in the high 70's/low 80's, and elite in mid/high 80's, with a rare low 90 player like peterson and manning.

                    as for those ratings, relative to each other, doesn't look bad. clowney is clearly the best player, followed by manziel and a handful of other good qb's and a few tackles.

                    Comment

                    • jello1717
                      All Star
                      • Feb 2006
                      • 5720

                      #25
                      Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

                      Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
                      They all too damn high......But then again they are always too high every year.
                      While I definitely would prefer the ratings to be lower, given the progression in dynasty, I don't think that these are too high. There's only 1 99 in this bunch. I've had bunches of guys in my offline and online dynasties that were rated 99, and that's with me not allowed to sway anyone that wants to leave early (which obviously would've drastically increased my # of 99s.

                      Below is my latest 99 and while he's very good, he's no Clowney and it'd be dumb if he was rated higher than Clowney.

                      Hell, I have 6 95+ guys on my team right now and there are 18 guys on the 8 USER teams in 2023 that are 95+. Again, we're not allowed to sway guys so this could be far worse. If there are more than 18 95+ guys in the future of dynasty, starting with 14 certainly isn't too many. Of course the best solution is to start lower and have less progression, but with the current progression, we need to start with high rated players.
                      Attached Files
                      Favorite Teams:
                      College #1: Michigan Wolverines
                      College #2: Michigan State Spartans (my alma mater)
                      College #3: North Carolina Tar Heels
                      NHL: Detroit Redwings

                      Comment

                      • jello1717
                        All Star
                        • Feb 2006
                        • 5720

                        #26
                        Re: Top 15 Players in NCAA Football 14

                        Originally posted by theharbinater
                        agreed. i wish ncaa and madden would be cooperative in their ratings.

                        a 99 should be best in the world, all-timer type player, and should never happen in college.

                        i dont think there should be a cap on college players, but very rarely should any of them be in the 90's, and the elite should usually be in the mid-high 80's where most good-not-great pro's are. maybe a handful each year. those that would play and impact from day 1 in nfl, like clowney, julio/aj green a few years back, cam newton, luck/rg3, etc.

                        most players should be in 60's/70's, with the good in the high 70's/low 80's, and elite in mid/high 80's, with a rare low 90 player like peterson and manning.

                        as for those ratings, relative to each other, doesn't look bad. clowney is clearly the best player, followed by manziel and a handful of other good qb's and a few tackles.
                        I disagree completely with this. I think the 2 games should have 2 sets of ratings. The scales are (and should be) relative. A 99 in Madden should be the best to ever play in the NFL. Likewise a 99 in NCAA should be the best to ever play in the NCAA. There should be 90s in NCAA, which are the elite NCAA players (regardless of how they'd rate in Madden). A player's NCAA grade should have nothing to do with the NFL (since, of course, this isn't the NFL). A Pat White or Charlie Ward should be rated very highly in NCAA, even though they wouldn't be in Madden.
                        Favorite Teams:
                        College #1: Michigan Wolverines
                        College #2: Michigan State Spartans (my alma mater)
                        College #3: North Carolina Tar Heels
                        NHL: Detroit Redwings

                        Comment

                        • bucknut7
                          Pro
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 964

                          #27
                          Re: NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 15 Players

                          Say what you want about Braxton Miller's throwing ratings (a bit high, sure) but his running ratings are way low. 83 elusiveness? And you can't tell me Manziel is faster

                          Comment

                          • zac358
                            Rookie
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 74

                            #28
                            Teddy should have been the second best qb.

                            Comment

                            • The JareBear
                              Be Good To One Another
                              • Jul 2010
                              • 11560

                              #29
                              Re: NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 15 Players

                              Strictly based off top speed, yes I'd say BM is faster, but I think Manziel is quicker.
                              "Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."

                              OS Blog

                              The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.

                              Comment

                              • Joobieo
                                Madden & NBA 2K fanatic
                                • Jul 2012
                                • 792

                                #30
                                Originally posted by freernnur5
                                Everything looks good to me except this one point when discussing Braxton Miller:

                                "Miller is a very good passer (91 Throw Power, 84 Throw Accuracy)"

                                He is an excellent runner as a QB, but not that good as a passer. He finished tied for 43rd in the country in passer rating at 140.5 (McCarron was #1 at 175.3). His YPA of 8.0 is tied for 25th with 9 other QBs. His completion percentage of 58.3% was good for 80th in the country.

                                Do those stats really show someone who is a very good passer to you?

                                I know I am a Michigan fan so this may sound like the homer in me talking. He is a very good QB because of his legs and that opens throwing opportunities for him, but to say he is a very good passer is a little laughable.

                                Just compare that year of his to Denard Robinson's from 2011 (2012 he was injured for 5 games and was not a QB so the stats aren't a fair comparison).

                                2011 - 55.0%, 8.4 YPA, 139.7 passer rating.

                                Keep in mind Denard had 15 ints that year to sink his passer rating as opposed to the 6 Miller had in 2012. Everyone, including myself would admit Denard Robinson is not a very good passer. He was electric because of his legs first and foremost.
                                Braxton Miller received OSU love that's the only way he is breaking 90 overall. I'm from Ohio and even I can't stand the hype he's been getting lately.
                                Currently playing FIFA 2013 & DOTA 2 ( PC )
                                Marine by day, gamer by night.

                                Comment

                                Working...