Exclusivity has been banned due to a recent Supreme Court case. Whether 2K Sports would risk it is the question. The whole "player thing" is unresolved. If they don't pay the players and the NCAA loses, then they could be screwed, but they can't go out and preemptively pay the players in the meantime, either. I can't see any way forward but for the gaming companies to simply have teams of fake players (even if it is still called Ohio State) until this is all resolved.
O'Bannon Legal Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: O'Bannon Legal Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
Exclusivity has been banned due to a recent Supreme Court case. Whether 2K Sports would risk it is the question. The whole "player thing" is unresolved. If they don't pay the players and the NCAA loses, then they could be screwed, but they can't go out and preemptively pay the players in the meantime, either. I can't see any way forward but for the gaming companies to simply have teams of fake players (even if it is still called Ohio State) until this is all resolved. -
Re: O'Bannon Legal Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
Lol at the ppl mad at O'Bannon. Ya'll are funny manComment
-
Re: O'Bannon Legal Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
They do. That doesn't mean it's legal.I can't for the life of me understand how the NCAA or schools don't have a waiver that athletes need to sign that says the school and or NCAA can use their likeness while they are in the athletic programs. It seems like that would have been thought of a long time ago.Comment
-
Re: O'Bannon Defense Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
Agreed - and it seems difficult to see how they will hold EA accountable given the fact that they paid a fee to both the NCAA and the other licensing agency each year. If the NCAA, which makes the rules, wasn't finding fault in what they were doing and they are the governing authority in all of this as far as the student-athletes are concerned then it will be difficult to seek damages against EA.O'Bannon's legal team will beat the likeness argument in court... I can't imagine how he loses that end of the lawsuit.
Where the lawyers are going to fail, is going to be what compensation amateur athletes are entitled to. When you register with the NCAA (in any sport, not just football), you waive your rights of representation on the universities behalf.
They can put you on posters, programs, television from games to sports shows, to media guides... and every athlete signs their rights away when they join NCAA division sports.
O'Bannon and Keller are going to win the battle of likeliness in a game, but they're going to lose the war against the NCAA for signing their rights away. They're going to lose against a system of amateur rules (as unfair as they may be), going back to old Olympic rules that most governing bodies have adopted.Comment
-
Re: O'Bannon Legal Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
what are the chances that the NCAA ceases to exist? if you're goin after video games of all things, why stop there O'Bannon? might as well sue ESPN for making all that money covering college football.
Comment
-
Re: O'Bannon Defense Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
This is true, this case has extremely wide sweeping ramifications. I've looked into it, and some of it could really be ugly.This, of course, has been an increasingly popular discussion across the country. Should student athletes get paid to play (football)? The answer, I think, lies in the scale to which college football has become such a powerfully profitable enterprise. Think about it, EA Sports sells an NCAA football game because college football is huge. They don't sell a college baseball game because college baseball isn't huge. It comes down to market demand.
This lawsuit is more a catalyst to changing the landscape of money in college athletics than the largely academic debate that's been ongoing. Former players think that they should profit from video game sales, but that only kicks down the door to any other sale of merchandise related to their college playing career. Watch out.Bulls|Bears|Cubs| Blackhawks|Huskies|Horned Frogs|
Comment
-
Re: O'Bannon Legal Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
That would be the likely next step.Bulls|Bears|Cubs| Blackhawks|Huskies|Horned Frogs|
Comment
-
I'm in. Let's sue his sorry ***GO PACK GO!Comment
-
Comment
-
The growth of interest in College Football over the last 20 years is huge, I wonder how many people out their have had their interest in CFB either started or increased because of a video game?Comment
-
Re: O'Bannon Legal Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
I've never understood this sentiment. Did O'Bannon's and Keller's careers not take off like they had imagined? Yes.
But you're also forgetting who else is on that list, names like Oscar Robertson and Bill Russell whose careers certainly weren't washed out.
Like it or not, this case has real standing and it'll be up to the courts decide. I'm no more or less unhappy than you are, but I'm not letting that cloud the fact that this case is legitimate.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: O'Bannon Defense Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
Depending on the school they choose, they are already compensated between 15k-100k+ a year, over a three to four year span. I still the fact that college football can hardly be considered interscholastic (focusing on the root word scholar) sports, but if they indeed decide to compensate players beyond their already lofty compensation, I'd hope they would just drop the idea that it is the University of Michigan vs Ohio State University.This, of course, has been an increasingly popular discussion across the country. Should student athletes get paid to play (football)? The answer, I think, lies in the scale to which college football has become such a powerfully profitable enterprise. Think about it, EA Sports sells an NCAA football game because college football is huge. They don't sell a college baseball game because college baseball isn't huge. It comes down to market demand.
This lawsuit is more a catalyst to changing the landscape of money in college athletics than the largely academic debate that's been ongoing. Former players think that they should profit from video game sales, but that only kicks down the door to any other sale of merchandise related to their college playing career. Watch out.
Make them choose between the scholarship or its monetary equivalent.Thanks to LBzrules: So these threads won't be forever lost.
Tiered Play Calling
Outs and Curls (Bracketing Receivers)
If anybody is interested in a "spiritual successor to the socom franchise, check out this thread.Comment
-
Re: O'Bannon Defense Team Reacts to NCAA Decision
Ah yes, the 'every document you sign is legally binding' and 'just because that's the way it's always been' arguments. Those will absolutely help the NCAA...O'Bannon's legal team will beat the likeness argument in court... I can't imagine how he loses that end of the lawsuit.
Where the lawyers are going to fail, is going to be what compensation amateur athletes are entitled to. When you register with the NCAA (in any sport, not just football), you waive your rights of representation on the universities behalf.
They can put you on posters, programs, television from games to sports shows, to media guides... and every athlete signs their rights away when they join NCAA division sports.
O'Bannon and Keller are going to win the battle of likeliness in a game, but they're going to lose the war against the NCAA for signing their rights away. They're going to lose against a system of amateur rules (as unfair as they may be), going back to old Olympic rules that most governing bodies have adopted.
The NCAA has no case here. They bring in almost a billion dollars a year in large part due to student athletes. It's just a matter of time before these athletes receive a cut of EVERYTHING sold that bears their likeness or uniform number, which they should.Comment

Comment